Cited by 136

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

IgE to food allergens are highly prevalent in patients allergic to pollens, with and without symptoms of food allergy

BIRCHER, A. J., VAN MELLE, G., HALLER, E., CURTY, B., FREI, P. C.·1994·Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Abstract

Summary: Serum samples from 274 patients allergic to one or more of three pollens (birch, grass, mugwort), from 36 patients allergic to cat and/or Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus but not to pollen and from 55 non‐allergic controls, as well as 20 cord blood samples, were examined for specific IgE to six ‘pollen‐associated’ food allergens In uiing a new sensitive assay (CAP). A questionnaire asking for reactions to food was also sent to all patients. In the pollen group, 111 patients (47%) were positive (≥0.71 kU/l) fora food allergen (392 positive tests). Of these, 92 were sensitive to apple, 68 to potato, 64 to carrot, 63 to celery, 61 to peach and 44 to melon. In the non‐allergic group, no IgE to any of the food allergens tested was found, whereas in the group allergic to non‐pollen allergens, only one individual had such an IgE. The CAP assay was found to he more sensitive than RAST for the allergens studied. A history of clinical reactions (oral symptoms in 67, rhinoconjunctivitis in 65, asthma in 42 and urticaria in 39) to the corresponding food allergen was reported mainly by patients with positive CAP. In conclusion, we found a high prevalence of IgE to some food allergens in patients allergic to pollen and Ihe absence of such antibodies in the control groups. The new in vitro assay, being moresensitue than previous ones, indicated a high prevalence of food specific IgE in pollen allergic patients, which in many cases did not correspond to clinical symptoms of food allergy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1994.tb00248.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1978.tb01524.x · DOI
  2. Dreborg S., 1988, Food allergy in pollen‐sensitive patients, Ann Allergy, 61, 41
  3. 10.1159/000233550 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1987.tb02225.x · DOI
  5. Berrens I, 1990, Cross‐reactivity among the pollen proteins of birch and apple trees, Allerg Immunol, 36, 147
  6. 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90133-0 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1992.tb02818.x · DOI
  8. Rec R, 1992, Profilin is a cross‐reactive allergen in pollen and vegetable foods, Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol, 91, 97
  9. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1987.tb02317.x · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0091-6749(89)90083-3 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Wülhrich B., 1990, Birkenpollen‐Allergie in Verbindung mit Unverträglichkeiten gegen verschiedene Obslsorten, Hau-tarzi, 41, 583
  12. 10.2500/108854191778879278 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1990.tb00466.x · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1986.tb00770.x · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0091-6749(90)90048-9 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1990.tb01080.x · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1991.tb00814.x · DOI
  18. 10.1084/jem.175.2.377 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1990.tb00941.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
BIRCHER, A. J., VAN MELLE, G., HALLER, E., CURTY, B., & FREI, P. C.
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-04
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
367-374
ISSN
  • 0954-7894
  • 1365-2222
Cited by
136
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review