Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of maternal atopy and probiotic supplementation during pregnancy on infant sensitization: a double‐blind placebo‐controlled study

Huurre, A., Laitinen, K., Rautava, S., Korkeamäki, M., Isolauri, E.·2008·Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Abstract

Summary: Background The effects of breastfeeding and probiotics on infant sensitization still remain discrepant. Objective To explore probable explanatory factors in infant sensitization and the protective effect of probiotics. Methods Altogether 171 mother–infant pairs from an ongoing placebo‐controlled double‐blind study with nutrition modulation by dietary counselling and probiotic supplementation were studied. Skin prick testing was done in infants at 6 and 12 months and in mothers at third trimester of pregnancy. The breast milk concentrations of cytokines TGF‐β2, soluble CD14, IFN‐γ, TNF‐α, IL‐10, IL‐6, IL‐4 and IL‐2 were measured. Results The risk of sensitization increased in infants with allergic mothers breastfeeding over 6 months [odds ratio (OR=4.83, P=0.005)], or exclusively breastfeeding over 2.5 months (OR=3.4, P=0.018). Probiotic supplementation had a protective effect against sensitization in infants with a high hereditary risk due to maternal sensitization (OR=0.3, P=0.023). The concentration of TGF‐β2 tended to be higher in the colostrum of the mothers in the probiotic group as compared with those on placebo (probiotic/placebo ratio=1.50, P=0.073). A similar result was obtained in the subgroup of allergic mothers (probiotic/placebo ratio=1.56, P=0.094). Conclusion Infants of atopic mothers, specifically when breastfed exclusively over 2.5 months or totally over 6 months, had a higher risk of sensitization at the age of 12 months. This risk could be reduced by the use of probiotics during pregnancy and lactation, partly by resulting in a beneficial composition of the breast milk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03008.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Huurre, A., Laitinen, K., Rautava, S., Korkeamäki, M., & Isolauri, E.
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07-18
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
1342-1348
ISSN
  • 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2222
OpenAlex
W2119863745
Cited by
204
References
2
FWCI
8.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of maternal atopy and probiotic supplementation during pregnancy on infant sensitization: a double‐blind placebo‐controlled study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03008.x
The paper
Huurre, A., Laitinen, K., Rautava, S., Korkeamäki, M., & Isolauri, E. (2008). Impact of maternal atopy and probiotic supplementation during pregnancy on infant sensitization: a double‐blind placebo‐controlled study. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03008.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.