Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oral immunotherapy for IgE ‐mediated cow's milk allergy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Brożek, J. L., Terracciano, L., Hsu, J., Kreis, J., Compalati, E., Santesso, N., Fiocchi, A., Schünemann, H. J.·2012·Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Abstract

Summary: Cow's milk is a common cause of food allergy in children. Children usually outgrow cow's milk allergy by the age of 3–5 years, but some will have persistent symptoms beyond childhood. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials ( RCT s) and observational studies to assess the evidence supporting the use of oral immunotherapy in IgE‐mediated cow's milk allergy to inform the World Allergy Organization guidelines. Of 1034 screened articles published until May 2011, five RCT s and five observational studies fulfilled a priori specified inclusion criteria. RCT s including 218 patients showed that oral immunotherapy, compared to elimination diet alone, increased the likelihood of achieving full tolerance of cow's milk [relative risk: 10.0 (95% CI: 4.1–24.2)]. Adverse effects of immunotherapy include frequent local symptoms (16% of doses), mild laryngospasm [relative risk: 12.9 (1.7–98.6)], mild asthma [rate ratio: 3.8 (2.9–5.0)], reactions requiring oral glucocorticosteroids [relative risk: 11.3 (2.7–46.5)] or intramuscular epinephrine injection [rate ratio 5.8 (1.6–21.9)]. Results of observational studies were consistent with those of RCTs. Despite the availability of RCTs, the overall low quality of evidence leaves important uncertainty about anticipated effects of immunotherapy due to very serious imprecision of the estimates of effects and the likelihood of publication bias for some of the critical outcomes. A potentially large benefit of oral immunotherapy in patients with cow's milk allergy may be counterbalanced by frequent and sometimes serious adverse effects. Additional, larger RCTs measuring all patient‐important outcomes are still needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03948.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Brożek, J. L., Terracciano, L., Hsu, J., Kreis, J., Compalati, E., Santesso, N., Fiocchi, A., & Schünemann, H. J.
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-22
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
363-374
ISSN
  • 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2222
OpenAlex
W1972220093
Cited by
182
References
4
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oral immunotherapy for IgE ‐mediated cow's milk allergy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03948.x
The paper
Brożek, J. L., Terracciano, L., Hsu, J., Kreis, J., Compalati, E., Santesso, N., Fiocchi, A., & Schünemann, H. J. (2012). Oral immunotherapy for IgE ‐mediated cow's milk allergy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03948.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.