The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A clinical evaluation of acne scarring and its incidence
Abstract
Despite scarring being a recognized sequel of acne, the actual extent and incidence of residual scarring remains unknown. One hundred and eighty-five acne patients were included in this study (101 females, 84 males). Patients were selected from acne clinics and their acne scarring was examined. The scarring was quantified according to a lesion count and allocated a score. The type and extent of scarring was correlated to the age and sex of the patient, the site of the acne, the previous acne grade according to the Leeds Technique, acne type (noted in clinic at the original referral time) and duration of acne, before adequate therapeutic measures had been instituted. Results indicate that facial scarring affects both sexes equally and occurs to some degree in 95% of cases. Total scarring on the trunk was significantly greater in males, as was hypertrophic and keloid scarring in these sites (P < 0.05). There were significant correlations between the initial acne grade and the overall severity of scarring in all sites and in both sexes (P < 0.01). Superficial inflamed papular acne lesions as well as nodular lesions were capable of producing scars. A time delay up to 3 years between acne onset and adequate treatment related to the ultimate degree of scarring in both sexes and in all three sites. This emphasizes the need for earlier adequate therapy in an attempt to minimize the subsequent scarring caused by acne.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The prevalence of acne in adults 20 years and older
Collier, C. N., Harper, J. C., Cantrell, W. C., Wang, W., Foster, K. W., & Elewski, B. E. (2008) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2007.06.045 · Cited by 567
Tuchayi, S. M., Makrantonaki, E., Ganceviciene, R., Dessinioti, C., Feldman, S. R., & Zouboulis, C. C. (2015) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.29 · Cited by 432
Prevalence of facial acne in adults☆, ☆☆, ★
GOULDEN, V, STABLES, G., & CUNLIFFE, W. (1999) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70300-2 · Cited by 423
Self-citationManagement of acne: Canadian clinical practice guideline
Asai, Y., Baibergenova, A., Dutil, M., Humphrey, S., Hull, P., Lynde, C., Poulin, Y., Shear, N. H., Tan, J., Toole, J., et al. (2016) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.140665 · Cited by 95
Dréno, B., Bissonnette, R., Gagné-Henley, A., Barankin, B., Lynde, C., Kerrouche, N., & Tan, J. (2018) · American Journal of Clinical Dermatology · doi:10.1007/s40257-018-0352-y · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- LAYTON, A. M., HENDERSON, C. A., & CUNLIFFE, W. J.
- Venue
- Clinical and Experimental Dermatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 303-308
- ISSN
- 0307-6938 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2230
- OpenAlex
- W2024422870
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A clinical evaluation of acne scarring and its incidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2230.1994.tb01200.x
- The paper
- LAYTON, A. M., HENDERSON, C. A., & CUNLIFFE, W. J. (1994). A clinical evaluation of acne scarring and its incidence. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2230.1994.tb01200.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.