Cited by 53Dermatology and Skin DiseasesContact Dermatitis and AllergiesAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery

Comparison of hydration, sebum and pH values in clinically normal skin of patients with atopic dermatitis and healthy controls

Firooz, A., Gorouhi, F., Davari, P., Atarod, M., Hekmat, S., Rashighi-Firoozabadi, M., Solhpour, A.·2007·Clinical and Experimental Dermatology

Abstract

Conflict of interest: none declared. The water content of the stratum corneum and skin surface lipids forms a balance that is important for the appearance and function of the skin. An impaired balance may lead to the clinical manifestations known as ‘dry skin’, which is particularly seen in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).1 This study was designed to compare epidermal hydration, skin surface lipid content and skin pH in healthy volunteers with that of the clinically normal skin of patients with AD. In total, 30 patients > 10 years old, with a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis based on the Rajka and Hanifin criteria with no other concomitant diseases, and 30 normal controls matched for age and gender were included in this case‐control study. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Center for Research and Training in Skin Diseases and Leprosy. All patients gave written consent. Both the AD and control groups comprised 21 women and 9 men, with a mean age of 26.6 ± 9.7 years in the AD group and 25.4 ± 8.6 years in the control group. In the AD group, there were 6, 20 and 4 patients and in the control group 5, 21 and 4 subjects with Fitzpatrick skin types II, III, and IV, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2007.02364.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A link between an altered sebaceous gland function and skin barrier dysfunction seems to contribute to the development of atopic dermatitis, although the exact mechanisms have not been elucidated.

    “Therefore, a link between an altered sebaceous gland function and skin barrier dysfunction seem to contribute to the development of the disease, although the exact mechanisms have not been elucidated.40,41”

    From Sebaceous-immunobiology is orchestrated by sebum lipids (2017) · cites this paper as [40]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Firooz, A., Gorouhi, F., Davari, P., Atarod, M., Hekmat, S., Rashighi-Firoozabadi, M., & Solhpour, A.
Affiliations
Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Dermatology
Published
2007-05
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
321-322
ISSN
  • 0307-6938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2230
OpenAlex
W2008452673
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical and Experimental Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Keywords
atopic dermatitis, skin hydration, sebum, skin pH, stratum corneum water content, skin surface lipids, dry skin, Fitzpatrick skin type
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Body Water, Dermatitis, Atopic, Female, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Male, Sebum, Water Loss, Insensible, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review