Cited by 25Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

THE EFFECT OF THE INTESTINAL POLYPEPTIDES, IRP AND GIP, ON INSULIN|RELEASE AND GLUCOSE TOLERANCE IN THE BABOON

Abstract

The recently isolated intestinal polypeptides, intestinal insulin releasing polypeptide (IRP) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), have been shown to potentiate glucose stimulated insulin release in the baboon. The effect was similar to that seen in the rat and demonstrates that both peptides affect insulin release in a broad range of species. No effect on glucagon release was observed. The possibility that either IRP or GIP, or both, is involved in the alimentary augmentation of insulin release by oral glucose deserves consideration. It is now well recognized that intestinal hormones are concerned in the regulation of glucose homeostasis (McIntyre et al., 1964; Marks & Samols, 1970), but their absolute identity and relative importance is uncertain. Two recently isolated polypeptides, intestinal insulin releasing polypeptide (IRP) (Turner, 1972; Turner et al., 1973) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) (Brown et al., 1969), have been shown to produce dramatic effects on the insulinaemic response to intravenous glucose in the rat (Turner et al., 1973; Dupré, 1973). In order to determine whether these effects are limited to the rat, or a general phenomenon, the ability of the two peptides to augment the insulin response to intravenous glucose was examined in the baboon, Papio papio. In view of the known suppressive effect of oral glucose on glucagon release, plasma glucagon levels were also measured.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1974.tb02820.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bloom S.R., 1971, A specific and sensitive glucagon immunoassay, Diabetologia, 7, 472
  2. 10.1139/o71-122 · DOI
  3. 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009155 · DOI
  4. 10.1139/y69-020 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(64)90011-X · DOI · Paper page
  6. Marks V., 1970, Advances in Metabolic Disorders, 1
  7. 10.1016/S0016-5085(72)80144-6 · DOI
  8. Turner D.S.(1972)Intestinal factors and the control of insulin release.Ph.D. thesis University of London.
  9. 10.1210/endo-93-6-1323 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
TURNER, D. S., ETHERIDGE, L., JONES, J., MARKS, V., MELDRUM, B., BLOOM, S. R., & BROWN, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
TURNER, D. S.
Venue
Clinical Endocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1974-10
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
489-493
ISSN
  • 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2265
OpenAlex
W2049533855
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, insulin secretion, glucose tolerance, oral glucose, glucagon, intestinal hormones, glucose homeostasis, baboons, primates
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Animals, Female, Gastrointestinal Hormones, Glucagon, Glucose Tolerance Test, Insulin, Intestines, Male, Papio, Peptides, Stimulation, Chemical, Stomach

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review