The DOI matches its Crossref record.
INCIDENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF HYPERPROLACTINAEMIA IN WOMEN WITH AMENORRHOEA
Abstract
SUMMARY: Serum prolactin and gonadotrophin concentrations were measured by radio‐immunoassay in 106 women with amenorrhoea. Prolactin was normal in those with weight related disorders, primary ovarian failure, those with a variety of systemic diseases and in those in whom amenorrhoea followed treatment with the oral contraceptive and in unexplained primary amenorrhoea. Gonadotrophin concentrations in the above patients were normal except in those with primary ovarian failure. Prolactin was elevated in eight of forty patients (20%) with functional secondary amenorrhoea and was greatly raised in all but one of the thirteen women in this series with pituitary tumours (five of whom were studied only after treatment). Only three patients in each of the last two groups had galactorrhoea. Gonadotrophin levels were normal or slightly raised in all of the hyperprolactinaemic patients apart from those studied after hypophysectomy. Four hyperprolactinaemic patients (three with pituitary tumours and one with functional amenorrhoea) who did not have galactorrhoea have been treated with bromocriptine. Prolactin secretion was reduced in all patients and, in the two with normal gonadotrophins, ovulatory menstruation was resumed. One became pregnant in the second ovulation cycle after starting treatment. We conclude that, despite the rarity of galactorrhoea, hyperprolactinaemia is common in patients with functional amenorrhoea and in those with pituitary tumours. Treatment with bromocriptine in patients with normal gonadotrophins restores ovulation when the infertility is due to prolactin excess.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Decreased spinal mineral content in amenorrheic women
Cann, C. E. (1984) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03340290040017 · Cited by 409
Decreased Bone Density in Hyperprolactinemic Women
Klibanski, A., Neer, R. M., Beitins, I. Z., Ridgway, E. C., Zervas, N. T., & McArthur, J. W. (1980) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198012253032605 · Cited by 360
Franks, S., & Jacobs, H. S. (1983) · Clinics in Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1016/s0300-595x(83)80059-0 · Cited by 49
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- FRANKS, S., MURRAY, M. A. F., JEQUIER, A. M., STEELE, S. J., NABARRO, J. D. N., & JACOBS, H. S.
- Venue
- Clinical Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 597-607
- ISSN
- 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2265
- OpenAlex
- W1972369962
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: INCIDENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF HYPERPROLACTINAEMIA IN WOMEN WITH AMENORRHOEA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2265.1975.tb01929.x
- The paper
- FRANKS, S., MURRAY, M. A. F., JEQUIER, A. M., STEELE, S. J., NABARRO, J. D. N., & JACOBS, H. S. (1975). INCIDENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF HYPERPROLACTINAEMIA IN WOMEN WITH AMENORRHOEA. Clinical Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.1975.tb01929.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.