Cited by 68Adrenal Hormones and DisordersStress Responses and CortisolPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments

COMPARISON OF THE ACTH AND CORTISOL RESPONSES TO PROVOCATIVE TESTING WITH GLUCAGON AND INSULIN HYPOGLYCAEMIA IN NORMAL SUBJECTS

LITTLEY, M. D., GIBSON, S., WHITES, A., SHALET, M.·1989·Clinical Endocrinology

Abstract

The glucagon stimulation test (GST) is often used to assess pituitary ACTH reserve, particularly when other tests are contra-indicated. In a preliminary investigation, in patients with pituitary disease, we failed to demonstrate the ACTH dependence of the cortisol response. We have therefore compared the ACTH, cortisol and glucose responses to glucagon (1 mg s.c.), insulin (0.2 U/kg i.v., ITT) and placebo in six healthy male volunteers, sampling every 10 min for 6 h. During the GST, mean +/- SD serum cortisol rose from 256 +/- 80 nmol/l to a peak of 481 +/- 164 nmol/l (range 289-717 nmol/l, P less than 0.01) in comparison with 280 +/- 81 nmol/l to 602 +/- 110 nmol/l (range 493-742 nmol/l) during the ITT (P less than 0.002). The mean peak cortisol levels achieved in the two tests did not differ significantly. In the GST, plasma ACTH rose from a mean basal value of 10.9 +/- 16.6 ng/l to a mean peak level of 123 +/- 76 ng/l (P less than 0.02) (ACTH ng/l x 0.225 = pmol/l). The corresponding values in the ITT were 7.1 +/- 16.2 ng/l and 263 +/- 91 ng/l (P less than 0.001). The mean peak ACTH level was significantly greater during the ITT (P less than 0.05). Thus the cortisol response was ACTH dependent in both the GST and the ITT in normal subjects. Furthermore, the ACTH response was of sufficient duration to be detected by the usual procedure of sampling every 30 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1989.tb01276.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LITTLEY, M. D., GIBSON, S., WHITES, A., & SHALET, M.
Affiliations
Salford Royal Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
SHALET, M.
Venue
Clinical Endocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-11
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
527-534
ISSN
  • 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2265
OpenAlex
W2078209019
Cited by
68
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
ACTH, cortisol, glucagon stimulation test, insulin tolerance test, pituitary function testing, healthy volunteers, glycemic response
MeSH terms
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Adult, Glucagon, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypoglycemia, Insulin, Male, Pituitary Function Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review