Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characteristics and mortality of severe hyponatraemia – a hospital‐based study

Gill, Geoffrey, Huda, Bobby, Boyd, Alice, Skagen, Karolina, Wile, David, Watson, Ian, Van Heyningen, Charles·2006·Clinical Endocrinology

Abstract

Summary: Objective To determine the characteristics, causes and outcome of severe hyponatraemia (< 125 mmol/l) in hospitalized patients, and to identify mortality predictors. Design Prospective case controlled study of sequentially presenting patients with a serum sodium (Na) < 125 mmol/l. Patients and methods One hundred and four hyponatraemic and 104 randomly chosen normonatraemic (Na > 135 mmol/l) adult patients were studied. We measured hospital mortality and days in hospital, diagnoses, drug history and cause of hyponatraemia. Na was recorded at admission, as well as the closest level measured before death or discharge. In addition, the lowest Na was recorded (if this was not at admission). Results Hyponatraemic patients were older (mean age ± 1 SD 69 ± 14 years) than controls (61 ± 16 years, P < 0·001), but of similar sex ratio. On admission, Na in the hyponatraemic group was 125 ± 7 mmol/l compared with 139 ± 3 mmol/l in controls (P < 0·0001), but fell to 120 ± 4 mmol/l before rising at discharge to 131 ± 7 mmol/l (all changes P < 0·001). Overall mortality was 27% in hyponatraemic patients compared with 9% in controls (P = 0·009), and length of admission was also greater (16 ± 12 vs. 13 ± 11 days, P < 0·005). Mortality was greater in patients whose Na levels fell during admission (34%vs. 16%, P < 0·05), and these patients appeared to have an excess of diuretic‐induced and possibly iatrogenic hyponatraemia. Conclusions Severe hyponatraemia in hospital patients is associated with prolonged admissions and significantly increased mortality compared with normonatraemic patients. A particular group at high risk of death are those whose Na levels fall after admission. They may represent a ‘sicker’ group, and deserve increased monitoring and surveillance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02583.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gill, G., Huda, B., Boyd, A., Skagen, K., Wile, D., Watson, I., & Van Heyningen, C.
Venue
Clinical Endocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07-06
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
246-249
ISSN
  • 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2265
OpenAlex
W2034066102
Cited by
252
References
0
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.