The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Combined clinical, thyroid ultrasound and cytological features help to predict thyroid malignancy in follicular and Hϋrthle cell thyroid lesions: results from a series of 505 consecutive patients
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Objective The cytological patterns of follicular and Hϋrthle cell nodules are included among the indeterminate results of fine‐needle aspiration cytology, because distinction between benign and malignant lesion can only be made on histological criteria. The diagnostic value of atypia at cytology, clinical parameters and echographic patterns were examined to establish the risk of malignancy in 505 patients with follicular and Hϋrthle cell thyroid nodules at cytology. Design and patients The study included 505 consecutive patients who had undergone thyroidectomy from the period 2002–2005. Results Histological diagnosis of malignancy was carried out in 125 of 505 (25%) patients, the follicular variant of papillary carcinoma being the most frequent histotype. Only atypia at cytology (P < 0·0001) and spot microcalcifications at ultrasound (P = 0·009) were predictive of malignancy. Male gender, normal thyroid volume, single nodularity, nodule hypoechogenicity, size and blurred margins were associated with malignancy, although not significantly. An arbitrary clinical score allowed the identification of patients with high (41%, 110 patients) and low (16%, 242 patients) risk of malignancy. Combining the clinical score with the presence of atypia at cytology we could identify 30 patients (6%) in whom the risk of malignancy was as high as 63%. Conclusions Twenty‐five per cent of patients with a cytological result of follicular and Hϋrthle cell thyroid lesion had a final diagnosis of malignancy. Only atypia at cytology and spot microcalcifications at thyroid ultrasound were significantly associated with malignancy. Other clinical parameters and thyroid ultrasound patterns can be used to set up a clinical score useful for predicting the individual risk of malignancy before surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Remonti, L. R., Kramer, C. K., Leitão, C. B., Pinto, L. C. F., & Gross, J. L. (2015) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2014.0353 · Cited by 411
WFUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography: Part 4. Thyroid
Cosgrove, D., Barr, R., Bojunga, J., Cantisani, V., Chammas, M. C., Dighe, M., Vinayak, S., Xu, J.-M., & Dietrich, C. F. (2017) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.06.022 · Cited by 259
Elastography imaging: the 30 year perspective
Ormachea, J., & Parker, K. J. (2020) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/abca00 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Rago, T., Di Coscio, G., Basolo, F., Scutari, M., Elisei, R., Berti, P., Miccoli, P., Romani, R., Faviana, P., Pinchera, A., & Vitti, P.
- Venue
- Clinical Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11-09
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-20
- ISSN
- 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2265
- OpenAlex
- W2130061494
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combined clinical, thyroid ultrasound and cytological features help to predict thyroid malignancy in follicular and Hϋrthle cell thyroid lesions: results from a series of 505 consecutive patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02677.x
- The paper
- Rago, T., Di Coscio, G., Basolo, F., Scutari, M., Elisei, R., Berti, P., Miccoli, P., Romani, R., Faviana, P., Pinchera, A., & Vitti, P. (2007). Combined clinical, thyroid ultrasound and cytological features help to predict thyroid malignancy in follicular and Hϋrthle cell thyroid lesions: results from a series of 505 consecutive patients. Clinical Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02677.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.