Cited by 40Lepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyEvolution and Genetic DynamicsAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Industrial and non‐industrial melanism in the peppered moth, Bistort betularia (L.)

STEWARD, R. C.·1977·Ecological Entomology

Abstract

Abstract. 1. Estimates of the relative crypsis of the melanic and typical morphs of B.betularia have been made at fifty‐two sites in southern England and south Wales and these estimates were compared with melanic frequencies in samples from these sites. 2. The decrease from east to west in the frequency of the melanic form, carbonaria , and increase in the frequency of a second melanic form, insularia , across the southern part of England and Wales is largely independent of changes in smoke concentration, sulphur dioxide concentration or relative crypsis. 3. When all the available information on the distribution of the melanics of B.betularia is considered, sulphur dioxide concentration is correlated with the geographic variation in carbonaria frequency. This, together with evidence of the close relationship between carbonaria crypsis and sulphur dioxide levels, indicates that outside southern England and south Wales, either selective predation, or some direct selective effect of pollutants, is of major importance in determining the variation in carbonaria frequency. 4. Some features of the pattern of the spread of carbonaria in England and Wales during the last century give reasons for expecting non‐industrial selective factors to be of greater importance in determining the distribution of melanics of B.betularia in southern England and south Wales than in the rest of Britain.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1977.tb00886.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.2307/2402142 · DOI
  2. Bailey W.J., 1973, The status of the industrial melanics of Bistort betularia (L.) in the Isle of Man, Entomologist, 106, 210
  3. Barrett C.G., 1901, The Lepidoptera of the British Islands, 127
  4. Bishop J.A., 1976, Variation in some moths from the industrial north‐west of England, J. Linn. Soc. Lond. (Zool), 58, 275
  5. 10.2307/2401719 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/hdy.1970.45 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1974.tb04110.x · DOI
  8. Cavalli‐Sforza L., 1970, The Genetics of Human Populations
  9. 10.1038/202215a0 · DOI
  10. Douwes P., 1973, Melanism hos Biston betularius. I Danmark och Södra Sverge, Entomologen, 2, 15
  11. Edleston R.S., 1864, Amphydasis betularia, Entomologist, 2, 150
  12. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1937.tb00642.x · DOI
  13. Ford E.B., 1975, Ecological Genetics, 314
  14. Hewett W., 1898, Tephrosia bistorta and T.crepuscularia in the northern counties of England, Entomologist's Rec. J. Var., 10, 173
  15. Hoffman A., 1892, Amphidasis betularia var. doubledayaria, Entomologist's mon. Mag., 28, 48
  16. Holland W., 1884, Observations on Lepidoptera near Reading, Entomologist's mon. Mag., 21, 158
  17. James R., 1915, Lepidopterological notes for 1914, Entomologist's Rec. J. Var., 27, 3
  18. 10.1038/hdy.1955.36 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/175943a0 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/hdy.1956.28 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/hdy.1958.4 · DOI
  22. Kettlewell H.B.D., 1973, The Evolution of Melanism
  23. 10.1038/2201249a0 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/978-1-4757-0432-7_8 · DOI
  25. Lees D.R.(1971b)A study of some factors affecting the geographic distribution of melanism in moths.D.Phil. thesis Oxford.
  26. 10.1038/hdy.1973.24 · DOI
  27. Main H.&Harrison A.(1905)Amphidasis betularia. Proc. ent. Soc. Lond.p.6.
  28. Meteorological Office, 1969, Averages of Temperature 1931–1960 for Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  29. Shaw V.E., 1907, Cíty of London Entomological Society. Exhibits, Entomologist's Rec. J. Var., 19, 76
  30. Smallman R.S., 1906, Amphidasis betularia ab doubledayaria on Wimbledon Common, Entomologist's Rec. J. Var., 18, 240
  31. Stephenson H., 1858, Varieties of A.betularia, Entomologist's Weekly Intelligencer, 4, 75
  32. Steward R.C.(1977a)Multivariate analysis of variation within theinsulariacomplex of the mothBiston betularia.Heredity(in press). · DOI
  33. 10.2307/3825 · DOI
  34. Steward R.C., 1977, Industrial melanism in the moths Diurnea fagella and Allophyes oxyacanthae, J. Zool., Lond., 18, 3
  35. White D.F.B., 1876, On melanochroism and leucochroism, Entomologist's mon. Mag., 13, 172

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
STEWARD, R. C.
Affiliations
University of Wales (GB)
Corresponding author
STEWARD, R. C.
Venue
Ecological Entomology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1977-08
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
231-243
ISSN
  • 0307-6946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2311
OpenAlex
W2143189509
Cited by
40
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecological Entomology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
peppered moth, industrial melanism, crypsis, sulfur dioxide, smoke pollution, predation, southern England, South Wales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review