The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Heterogeneous distribution of beta and alpha‐2 adrenoceptor binding sites in human fat cells from various fat deposits: functional consequences
Abstract
Abstract.Investigations have been carried out to explain the heterogeneity of response to catecholamines of human fat cells from various deposits. Adipocytes from two subcutaneous sites (abdominal and femoral) were studied concomitantly in women while omental fat cells were taken from another group of patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Alpha‐2 and beta sites were identified in fat‐cell membranes with [3 H]yohimbine and [3 H]dihydroalprenolol, respectively. Lipolytic responses were tested with isoproterenol (beta agonist), clonidine (alpha‐2 agonist) and epinephrine. There are clear differences in the relative number of beta and alpha‐2 sites according to the origin of the fat deposit; beta sites are less numerous than alpha‐2 sites in subcutaneous fat cells of both regions (alpha‐2: beta sites are in a ratio of 3 ± 0·4:2 ± 0·4). However, in membranes of omental fat cells, beta sites are at least as numerous as alpha‐2 sites (ratio 0·9 ± 0·2). Epinephrine always has a higher affinity for alpha‐2 sites than for beta sites in the subcutaneous and omental deposits. In lipolysis studies, epinephrine, in the absence of adenosine in the incubation medium, initiated an anti‐lipolytic effect in femoral fat cells and promoted inhibition of lipolysis at lower concentrations in abdominal subcutaneous fat cells, the effect being reversed at higher doses; epinephrine, however, was always lipolytic in omental adipocytes. There was no striking difference in the sensitivity to isoproterenol in the various deposits. Clonidine had a higher affinity for alpha‐2 sites in femoral fat cells and was equipotent in the omental and abdominal ones. Thus, the differences in the lipolytic responses to epinephrine in adipocytes from different sites are linked to a variable alpha‐2 inhibiting effect (and alpha‐2 site number) rather than to a modified beta driven increase in lipolysis initiated by the physiological amine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metabolic Flexibility in Health and Disease
Goodpaster, B. H., & Sparks, L. M. (2017) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.015 · Cited by 995
Splanchnic lipolysis in human obesity
Nielsen, S., Guo, Z., Johnson, C. M., Hensrud, D. D., & Jensen, M. D. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci21047 · Cited by 933
Genetic and Nongenetic Determinants of Regional Fat Distribution
BOUCHARD, C., DESPRÉS, J.-P., & MAURIÈGE, P. (1993) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv-14-1-72 · Cited by 489
Genetic and Nongenetic Determinants of Regional Fat Distribution
BOUCHARD, C., DESPRÉS, J.-P., & MAURIÈGE, P. (1993) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.14.1.72 · Cited by 486
Self-citationDo regional differences in adipocyte biology provide new pathophysiological insights?
Lafontan, M., & Berlan, M. (2003) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0165-6147(03)00132-9 · Cited by 288
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- MAURIEGE, P., GALITZKY, J., BERLAN, M., & LAFONTAN, M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 156-165
- ISSN
- 0014-2972 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2362
- OpenAlex
- W1983115426
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heterogeneous distribution of beta and alpha‐2 adrenoceptor binding sites in human fat cells from various fat deposits: functional consequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2362.1987.tb02395.x
- The paper
- MAURIEGE, P., GALITZKY, J., BERLAN, M., & LAFONTAN, M. (1987). Heterogeneous distribution of beta and alpha‐2 adrenoceptor binding sites in human fat cells from various fat deposits: functional consequences. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2362.1987.tb02395.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.