Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 978

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Very high prevalence of thyroid nodules detected by high frequency (13 MHz) ultrasound examination

Guth, S., Theune, U., Aberle, J., Galach, A., Bamberger, C. M.·2009·European Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Background The prevalence of thyroid nodules in a healthy population is high: in the German Papillon study, nationwide ultrasound screening of more than 90 000 people using 7·5 MHz scanners revealed the presence of thyroid nodules in 33% of the normal population. A study employing more sensitive 13 MHz scanners has not been conducted so far. Materials and methods Six hundred and thirty‐five consecutive patients (33% female, 67% male, mean 56·7 years) presenting for a preventive health check up underwent ultrasound screening of the thyroid gland (Siemens Acuson Antares, 13 MHz‐linear scanner, B‐mode and Power mode) and measurement of the basal TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone) value. Size and degree of vascularization of the thyroid gland and of nodules were determined and analysed retrospectively. Results In 432 of 635 patients, thyroid nodules could be detected with an increasing incidence with age, in 338 without goiter. Mean thyroid size was 12·3 mL for women and 20·5 mL for men correlating strongly with body weight. Fifty‐three percentage of the nodules were smaller than 5 mm. Incidence of thyroid dysfunction was only 4%. No cancerous lesions could be found. Conclusions Using the 13 MHz technology, we found a substantially higher prevalence of thyroid nodules (68%) than the Papillon study (33%). Even if our population is older than in Papillon, the difference remains in comparable age groups. This is due to the higher sensitivity of 13 MHz scanning. Our study underlines the clinical significance of iodine deficiency and should renew the discussion on routine iodine supplementation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02162.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 978

Metadata

Authors
Guth, S., Theune, U., Aberle, J., Galach, A., & Bamberger, C. M.
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Investigation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-03
Volume
39
Issue
8
Pages
699-706
ISSN
  • 0014-2972 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2362
OpenAlex
W2077963729
Cited by
978
References
2
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Very high prevalence of thyroid nodules detected by high frequency (13 MHz) ultrasound examination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02162.x
The paper
Guth, S., Theune, U., Aberle, J., Galach, A., & Bamberger, C. M. (2009). Very high prevalence of thyroid nodules detected by high frequency (13 MHz) ultrasound examination. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02162.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.