The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
STUDIES ON THE DECOMPOSITION OF PLANT MATERIAL IN SOIL. V. THE EFFECTS OF PLANT COVER AND SOIL TYPE ON THE LOSS OF CARBON FROM 14 C LABELLED RYEGRASS DECOMPOSING UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS
Abstract
Summary: Ryegrass uniformly labelled with 1 4 C was allowed to decompose for 10 years under field conditions in a range of contrasting soils. The amount of organic matter already in a soil had no effect on the retention of labelled C by that soil, nor had a variation in soil pH of from 4.9 to 8.1. Decomposition was initially slower in a strongly acid soil (pH 3.7) but by the end of 5 years the difference between this soil and the others had almost disappeared. The more clay in a soil, the greater the retention of labelled C over the whole 10 year period; this was true of both strongly acid and near‐neutral soils. More labelled organic matter was leached from a soil containing 7.6% clay than from one with 17.5% clay, but the amount thus lost was insufficient to account for the difference in retention of C by the two soils. The decomposition of labelled plant material was faster in bare soil than in soil growing grass but the ‘protection’ thus given to the labelled C by the growing grass ended when the grass was removed. In bare soil about one third of the labelled ryegrass C was left after one year but thereafter decomposition became very much slower and about one eighth of the labelled C still remained in the soil after 10 years. The decay curve can be represented by a two compartment model, in which about 70% of the ryegrass C decomposed by a first order process of half life 0.25 years and the remainder by a similar process of half‐life 8 years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Radiocarbon Dating of Soil Organic Matter
Wang, Y., Amundson, R., & Trumbore, S. (1996) · Quaternary Research · doi:10.1006/qres.1996.0029 · Cited by 277
Cited by
Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils
TISDALL, J. M., & OADES, J. M. (1982) · Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x · Cited by 6,267
Stabilization and destabilization of soil organic matter: mechanisms and controls
Sollins, P., Homann, P., & Caldwell, B. A. (1996) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(96)00036-5 · Cited by 1,578
Towards a minimum data set to assess soil organic matter quality in agricultural soils
Gregorich, E. G., Carter, M. R., Angers, D. A., Monreal, C. M., & Ellert, B. H. (1994) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/cjss94-051 · Cited by 1,150
Johnston, A. E., Poulton, P. R., & Coleman, K. (2009) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)00801-8 · Cited by 568
Simulated nitrogen dynamics and losses in a layered agricultural soil
Johnsson, H., Bergstrom, L., Jansson, P.-E., & Paustian, K. (1987) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/0167-8809(87)90099-5 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- JENKINSON, D. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1977-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 424-434
- ISSN
- 0022-4588 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094895535
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STUDIES ON THE DECOMPOSITION OF PLANT MATERIAL IN SOIL. V. THE EFFECTS OF PLANT COVER AND SOIL TYPE ON THE LOSS OF CARBON FROM 14 C LABELLED RYEGRASS DECOMPOSING UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1977.tb02250.x
- The paper
- JENKINSON, D. S. (1977). STUDIES ON THE DECOMPOSITION OF PLANT MATERIAL IN SOIL. V. THE EFFECTS OF PLANT COVER AND SOIL TYPE ON THE LOSS OF CARBON FROM 14 C LABELLED RYEGRASS DECOMPOSING UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS. Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1977.tb02250.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.