The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stability of soil aggregates in relation to organic constituents and soil water content
Abstract
SUMMARY: The effects of soil organic matter content, soil water content and duration of wet‐sieving on aggregate stability of soils with contrasting cropping histories were investigated. Long‐term pasture samples had a greater aggregate stability than long‐term arable samples. However, air‐drying aggregates before wet‐sieving increased the aggregate stability of long‐term pasture samples, but decreased that of long‐term arable samples. With increasing duration of wet‐sieving, the proportion of water‐stable aggregates declined until a near‐constant value was reached for each sample. Thus, within a sample there are aggregates possessing a wide range of stabilities; with increasing time under arable cropping there is an increase in the proportion of unstable aggregates present, and the measured aggregate stability, therefore, declines. Unstable aggregates (defined as those dispersed after wet‐sieving for 1 min) generally had lower organic matter content than stable ones (those still intact after sieving for 15 min). The aggregate stability of a regrassed site (13 years of arable plus 2 years of pasture) was markedly higher than that of a corresponding site from 15 years of arable cropping. Nonetheless, levels of organic matter (organic C, total N and hydrolysable carbohydrate) were almost identical at the two sites. However, aggregates from the regrassed site did have a higher biomass C and water‐extractable carbohydrate content than those from the 15‐year arable site. For a group of soils with varying cropping histories, aggregate stability was significantly more closely correlated with hot water‐extractable carbohydrate content than with organic C or hydrolysable carbohydrate content. It is suggested that the hot water‐extractable carbohydrate fraction may represent a pool of carbohydrate involved in the formation of stable aggregates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils
TISDALL, J. M., & OADES, J. M. (1982) · Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x · Cited by 6,267
Cited by
Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S., & Denef, K. (2004) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.03.008 · Cited by 4,410
Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems
Six, J., Frey, S. D., Thiet, R. K., & Batten, K. M. (2006) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.0347 · Cited by 2,176
Stabilization and destabilization of soil organic matter: mechanisms and controls
Sollins, P., Homann, P., & Caldwell, B. A. (1996) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(96)00036-5 · Cited by 1,578
Towards a minimum data set to assess soil organic matter quality in agricultural soils
Gregorich, E. G., Carter, M. R., Angers, D. A., Monreal, C. M., & Ellert, B. H. (1994) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/cjss94-051 · Cited by 1,150
Haynes, R. J. (2005) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(04)85005-3 · Cited by 1,010
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- HAYNES, R. J., & SWIFT, R. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-83
- ISSN
- 0022-4588 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029098413
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stability of soil aggregates in relation to organic constituents and soil water content. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00046.x
- The paper
- HAYNES, R. J., & SWIFT, R. S. (1990). Stability of soil aggregates in relation to organic constituents and soil water content. Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00046.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.