The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility: I. Theory and methodology
Abstract
Summary: Crusting and erosion of cultivated soils result from aggregate breakdown and the detachment of soil fragments by rain, and the susceptibility of soil to these processes is often inferred from measurements of aggregate stability. Here, theories of aggregate breakdown are reviewed and four main mechanisms (i.e. slaking, breakdown by differential swelling, mechanical breakdown by raindrop impact and physico–chemical dispersion) are defined. Their relative importance depends on the nature of the rain, as well as on the soil's physical and chemical properties. The relations between aggregate breakdown, crusting and water erosion are analysed, and existing methods for the assessment of aggregate stability are reviewed. A unified framework for the measurement of aggregate stability is proposed to assess a soil's susceptibility to crusting and erosion. It combines three treatments having various wetting conditions and energies (fast wetting, slow wetting, and stirring after pre‐wetting) and measures the resulting fragment size distribution after each treatment. It is designed to compare different soils, or different climatic conditions for a given soil, not to compare time‐dependent changes in that soil.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils
TISDALL, J. M., & OADES, J. M. (1982) · Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x · Cited by 6,267
Cited by
Fire effects on soil aggregation: A review
Mataix-Solera, J., Cerdà, A., Arcenegui, V., Jordán, A., & Zavala, L. M. (2011) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.08.002 · Cited by 701
Effect of biochar on soil physical properties in two contrasting soils: an Alfisol and an Andisol
Herath, H. M. S. K., Camps-Arbestain, M., & Hedley, M. (2013) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.016 · Cited by 674
Peng, X., Ye, L. L., Wang, C. H., Zhou, H., & Sun, B. (2011) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2011.01.002 · Cited by 656
Ecological mitigation of hillslope instability: ten key issues facing researchers and practitioners
Stokes, A., Douglas, G. B., Fourcaud, T., Giadrossich, F., Gillies, C., Hubble, T., Kim, J. H., Loades, K. W., Mao, Z., McIvor, I. R., et al. (2014) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-014-2044-6 · Cited by 398
LE BISSONNAIS, Y., & ARROUAYS, D. (1997) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00183.x · Cited by 375
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- LE BISSONNAIS, Y.
- Venue
- European Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 425-437
- ISSN
- 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2389
- OpenAlex
- W2148956054
- Cited by
- 1,503
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility: I. Theory and methodology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01843.x
- The paper
- LE BISSONNAIS, Y. (1996). Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility: I. Theory and methodology. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01843.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.