Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 408

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aggregate‐occluded black carbon in soil

Brodowski, S., John, B., Flessa, H., Amelung, W.·2006·European Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

Summary: The great stability of black carbon (BC) in soils may not be solely attributable to its refractory structure but also to poor accessibility when physically enveloped by soil particles. Our aim was to elucidate the intensity of physical entrapment of BC within soil aggregates. For this purpose, the A horizon of a forest, and of a grassland soil, and of three soils under tillage, were sampled at the experimental station Rotthalmünster, Germany. Black carbon was assessed in water‐stable aggregates and aggregate‐density fractions using benzene polycarboxylic acids as specific markers. The greatest BC concentrations made up 7.2% of organic carbon and were found in the < 53 μm fraction. The smallest BC concentrations occurred in the large macroaggregate fractions (> 2 mm). This pattern has been sustained even after tillage. The C‐normalized BC concentrations were significantly greater ( P < 0.05) in the occluded particulate organic matter (OPOM) fractions than in the free particulate organic matter (FPOM) and the mineral fractions. This enrichment of BC compared with organic carbon in the OPOM fractions amounted to factors of 1.5–2.7. Hence, BC was embedded within microaggregates in preference to other organic carbon compounds. Only 2.5–3.5% of BC was located in the OPOM fraction < 1.6 g cm −3 , but 22–24% in the OPOM fraction with a density of 1.6–2.0 g cm −3 . This suggests that BC possibly acted as a binding agent or was selectively enriched during decomposition of protected SOM, or both. Physical inclusion, particularly within microaggregates, could therefore contribute to the long mean‐residence times of soil‐inherent BC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00807.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 408

Metadata

Authors
Brodowski, S., John, B., Flessa, H., & Amelung, W.
Venue
European Journal of Soil Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03-24
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
539-546
ISSN
  • 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2389
OpenAlex
W2012773836
Cited by
408
References
30
FWCI
14.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aggregate‐occluded black carbon in soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00807.x
The paper
Brodowski, S., John, B., Flessa, H., & Amelung, W. (2006). Aggregate‐occluded black carbon in soil. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00807.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.