The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soil organic matter chemistry in allophanic soils: a pyrolysis‐GC/MS study of a Costa Rican Andosol catena
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Soil organic matter (SOM) in allophanic soils is supposed to accumulate due to protection caused by binding to allophane, aluminium and iron. We investigated a catena of allophanic and non‐allophanic soils in Costa Rica to determine the effect of such binding mechanisms on SOM chemistry. These soils contain no contribution of black carbon. Molecular characterization of litter, extractable and dispersed organic matter was done by Curie‐point pyrolysis‐GC/MS. The molecular chemistry of the organic fractions indicates a strong decomposition of plant‐derived organic matter and a strong contribution of microbial sugars and N‐compounds to SOM. Both the decomposition of plant‐derived SOM – including that of relatively recalcitrant compounds – and the relative contribution of microbial SOM were greater in allophanic samples than in non‐allophanic ones. This suggests that chemical protection does not act on primary OM, although it may influence the accumulation of secondary OM in these soils. The effect of allophane on SOM contents in such perhumid soils is probably through incorporation of decomposition products and microbial SOM in very fine aggregates that – in a perhumid environment – remain saturated with water during much of the year. Greater concentrations of aliphatics are found in allophanic residues, but there is no evidence of any specific mineral‐organic binding. The results do not support the existing theory of chemical protection of plant‐derived components through binding to allophane, iron and aluminium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pyrolysis—gas chromatography/mass spectrometry of amino acids
Chiavari, G., & Galletti, G. C. (1992) · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · doi:10.1016/0165-2370(92)85024-f · Cited by 301
Cited by
Cotrufo, M. F., Wallenstein, M. D., Boot, C. M., Denef, K., & Paul, E. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12113 · Cited by 3,552
Lorenz, K., Lal, R., Preston, C. M., & Nierop, K. G. J. (2007) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.07.013 · Cited by 425
Analytical pyrolysis as a tool to probe soil organic matter
Derenne, S., & Quénéa, K. (2015) · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2014.12.001 · Cited by 142
Soil Carbon Sequestration Resulting from Long‐Term Application of Biosolids for Land Reclamation
Tian, G., Granato, T. C., Cox, A. E., Pietz, R. I., Carlson, C. R., & Abedin, Z. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2007.0471 · Cited by 122
Lyu, H., Zhong, R., Kilasara, M., Hartono, A., Sun, Z., Funakawa, S., & Watanabe, T. (2024) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c07000 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Buurman, P., Peterse, F., & Almendros Martin, G.
- Venue
- European Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-06-26
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1330-1347
- ISSN
- 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2389
- OpenAlex
- W2072320494
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil organic matter chemistry in allophanic soils: a pyrolysis‐GC/MS study of a Costa Rican Andosol catena. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00925.x
- The paper
- Buurman, P., Peterse, F., & Almendros Martin, G. (2007). Soil organic matter chemistry in allophanic soils: a pyrolysis‐GC/MS study of a Costa Rican Andosol catena. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00925.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.