Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nitrifier denitrification can be a source of N 2 O from soil: a revised approach to the dual‐isotope labelling method

Open access
Kool, D. M., Wrage, N., Zechmeister‐Boltenstern, S., Pfeffer, M., Brus, D., Oenema, O., Van Groenigen, J.‐W.·2010·European Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

Nitrifier denitrification (i.e. nitrite reduction by ammonia oxidizers) is one of the biochemical pathways of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) production. It is increasingly suggested that this pathway may contribute substantially to N 2 O production in soil, the major source of this greenhouse gas. However, although monoculture studies recognize its potential, methodological drawbacks prohibit conclusive proof that nitrifier denitrification occurs in actual soils. Here we suggest and apply a new isotopic approach to identify its presence in soil. In incubation experiments with 12 soils, N 2 O production was studied using oxygen (O) and nitrogen (N) isotope tracing, accounting for O exchange. Microbial biomass C and N and phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) patterns were analysed to explain potential differences in N 2 O production pathways. We found that in at least five of the soils nitrifier denitrification must have contributed to N 2 O production. Moreover, it may even have been responsible for all NH 4 + ‐derived N 2 O in most soils. In contrast, N 2 O as a by‐product of ammonia oxidation contributed very little to total production. Microbial biomass C and N and PLFA‐distinguished microbial community composition were not indicative of differences in N 2 O production pathways. Overall, we show that combined O and N isotope tracing may still provide a powerful tool to understand N 2 O production pathways, provided that O exchange is accounted for. We conclude that nitrifier denitrification can indeed occur in soils, and may in fact be responsible for the greater proportion of total nitrifier‐induced N 2 O production.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01270.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Kool, D. M., Wrage, N., Zechmeister‐Boltenstern, S., Pfeffer, M., Brus, D., Oenema, O., & Van Groenigen, J. ‐.
Venue
European Journal of Soil Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-29
Volume
61
Issue
5
Pages
759-772
ISSN
  • 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2389
OpenAlex
W2098577335
Cited by
174
References
0
FWCI
16.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrifier denitrification can be a source of N 2 O from soil: a revised approach to the dual‐isotope labelling method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01270.x
The paper
Kool, D. M., Wrage, N., Zechmeister‐Boltenstern, S., Pfeffer, M., Brus, D., Oenema, O., & Van Groenigen, J. ‐. (2010). Nitrifier denitrification can be a source of N 2 O from soil: a revised approach to the dual‐isotope labelling method. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01270.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.