The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nitrifier denitrification can be a source of N 2 O from soil: a revised approach to the dual‐isotope labelling method
Open accessAbstract
Nitrifier denitrification (i.e. nitrite reduction by ammonia oxidizers) is one of the biochemical pathways of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) production. It is increasingly suggested that this pathway may contribute substantially to N 2 O production in soil, the major source of this greenhouse gas. However, although monoculture studies recognize its potential, methodological drawbacks prohibit conclusive proof that nitrifier denitrification occurs in actual soils. Here we suggest and apply a new isotopic approach to identify its presence in soil. In incubation experiments with 12 soils, N 2 O production was studied using oxygen (O) and nitrogen (N) isotope tracing, accounting for O exchange. Microbial biomass C and N and phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) patterns were analysed to explain potential differences in N 2 O production pathways. We found that in at least five of the soils nitrifier denitrification must have contributed to N 2 O production. Moreover, it may even have been responsible for all NH 4 + ‐derived N 2 O in most soils. In contrast, N 2 O as a by‐product of ammonia oxidation contributed very little to total production. Microbial biomass C and N and PLFA‐distinguished microbial community composition were not indicative of differences in N 2 O production pathways. Overall, we show that combined O and N isotope tracing may still provide a powerful tool to understand N 2 O production pathways, provided that O exchange is accounted for. We conclude that nitrifier denitrification can indeed occur in soils, and may in fact be responsible for the greater proportion of total nitrifier‐induced N 2 O production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhu, X., Burger, M., Doane, T. A., & Horwath, W. R. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1219993110 · Cited by 849
Hu, H.-W., Chen, D., & He, J.-Z. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv021 · Cited by 800
Nitrifier denitrification as a distinct and significant source of nitrous oxide from soil
Kool, D. M., Dolfing, J., Wrage, N., & Van Groenigen, J. W. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.09.030 · Cited by 490
Self-citationEcology of Nitrogen Fixing, Nitrifying, and Denitrifying Microorganisms in Tropical Forest Soils
Pajares, S., & Bohannan, B. J. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01045 · Cited by 331
Is wood ash amendment a suitable mitigation strategy for N2O emissions from soil?
Bornø, M. L., Rønn, R., & Ekelund, F. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136581 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Kool, D. M., Wrage, N., Zechmeister‐Boltenstern, S., Pfeffer, M., Brus, D., Oenema, O., & Van Groenigen, J. ‐.
- Venue
- European Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-29
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 759-772
- ISSN
- 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2389
- OpenAlex
- W2098577335
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrifier denitrification can be a source of N 2 O from soil: a revised approach to the dual‐isotope labelling method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01270.x
- The paper
- Kool, D. M., Wrage, N., Zechmeister‐Boltenstern, S., Pfeffer, M., Brus, D., Oenema, O., & Van Groenigen, J. ‐. (2010). Nitrifier denitrification can be a source of N 2 O from soil: a revised approach to the dual‐isotope labelling method. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01270.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.