Fine scale spatial pattern of Pacific sardine (Sardinops sagax) and northern anchovy (Engraulis mordax) eggs
Abstract
Pacific sardine (Sardinops sagax) and northern anchovy (Engraulis mordax) eggs exhibited different spatial structure on the scale of 0.75–2.5 km in two egg patches sampled in the Southern California Bight in April 2000. Plankton samples were collected at 4‐min intervals with a Continuous Underway Fish Egg Sampler (CUFES) on 5 × 5 km grids centered on surface drifters. Variograms were calculated for sardine and anchovy eggs in Lagrangian coordinates, using abundances of individual developmental stages grouped into daily cohorts. Model variograms for sardine eggs have a low nugget effect, about 10% of the total variance, indicating high autocorrelation between adjacent samples. In contrast, model variograms for anchovy eggs have a high nugget effect of 50–100%, indicating that most of the variance at the scales sampled is spatially unstructured. The difference between observed spatial patterns of sardine and anchovy eggs on this scale may reflect the behavior of the spawning adults: larger, faster, more abundant fish may organize into larger schools with greater structure and mobility that create smoother egg distributions. Size and mobility vary with population size in clupeoids. The current high abundance of sardines and low abundance of anchovy off California agree with the greater autocorrelation of sardine egg samples and the observed tendency for locations of anchovy spawning to be more persistent on the temporal scale of days to weeks. Thus the spatial pattern of eggs an…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sardine has a more fragmented spatial distribution.
“to have a more fragmented spatial distribution (Barange andHampton, 10 1997, Curtis, 2004)”
From Modelling potential spawning habitat of sardine ( <i>Sardina pilchardus</i> ) and anchovy ( <i>Engraulis encrasicolus</i> ) in the Bay of Biscay (2007) · cites this paper as Curtis, 2004
Cites
Worldwide large-scale fluctuations of sardine and anchovy populations
Schwartzlose, R. A., Alheit, J., Bakun, A., Baumgartner, T. R., Cloete, R., Crawford, R. J. M., Fletcher, W. J., Green-Ruiz, Y., Hagen, E., Kawasaki, T., et al. (1999) · South African Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.2989/025776199784125962 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
PLANQUE, B., BELLIER, E., & LAZURE, P. (2007) · Fisheries Oceanography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2419.2006.00411.x · Cited by 184 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alexandra Curtis, K.
- Venue
- Fisheries Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06-20
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 239-254
- ISSN
- 1054-6006 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2419
- OpenAlex
- W2105961596
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Fisheries Oceanography (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Central University of Finance and Economics
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Keywords
- Pacific sardine, northern anchovy, fish eggs, spatial distribution, semivariogram, nugget effect, spawning behavior, spawning grounds, population size, Southern California Bight, plankton sampling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review