Cited by 154Marine and fisheries researchOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFish Ecology and Management Studies

Albacore (Thunnus alalunga) fishing ground in relation to oceanographic conditions in the western North Pacific Ocean using remotely sensed satellite data

ZAINUDDIN, MUKTI, SAITOH, KATSUYA, SAITOH, SEI‐ICHI·2008·Fisheries Oceanography

Abstract

Satellite‐based oceanographic data of sea surface temperature (SST), sea surface chlorophyll‐a concentration (SSC), and sea surface height anomaly (SSHA) together with catch data were used to investigate the relationship between albacore fishing ground and oceanographic conditions and also to predict potential habitats for albacore in the western North Pacific Ocean. Empirical cumulative distribution function and high catch data analyses were used to calculate preferred ranges of the three oceanographic conditions. Results indicate that highest catch per unit efforts (CPUEs) corresponded with areas of SST 18.5–21.5°C, SSC 0.2–0.4 mg m−3, and SSHA −5.0 to 32.2 cm during the winter in the period 1998–2000. We used these ranges to generate a simple prediction map for detecting potential fishing grounds. Statistically, to predict spatial patterns of potential albacore habitats, we applied a combined generalized additive model (GAM) / generalized linear model (GLM). To build our model, we first constructed a GAM as an exploratory tool to identify the functional relationships between the environmental variables and CPUE; we then made parameters out of these relationships using the GLM to generate a robust prediction tool. The areas of highest CPUEs predicted by the models were consistent with the potential habitats on the simple prediction map and observation data, suggesting that the dynamics of ocean eddies (November 1998 and 2000) and fronts (November 1999) may account for the s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2419.2008.00461.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ZAINUDDIN, M., SAITOH, K., & SAITOH, S.
Affiliations
  • Hasanuddin University (ID)
  • Japan Fisheries Information Service Center (JP)
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
Corresponding author
ZAINUDDIN, MUKTI
Venue
Fisheries Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
61-73
ISSN
  • 1054-6006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2419
OpenAlex
W2062447772
Cited by
154
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Fisheries Oceanography (publishedVersion)
  • Hasanuddin University Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Science Society
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
albacore tuna, tuna fishing grounds, oceanographic conditions, sea surface temperature, chlorophyll-a concentration, sea level anomalies, catch per unit effort, habitat prediction, ocean eddies, ocean fronts, western North Pacific, multispectral satellite data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review