The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The prediction of the macro‐invertebrate fauna of unpolluted running‐water sites in Great Britain using environmental data
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY. 1. A procedure has been developed which uses environmental data to predict the probabilities of macro‐invertebrate taxa occurring at running‐water sites in Great Britain. 2. Biological, physical and chemical data were collected from twenty‐ one sites on three river systems in order to evaluate the procedure. 3. For most sites the number and type of taxa recorded, using a standard sampling programme, were very close to those predicted using twenty‐eight environmental variables. 4. Comparison with other studies at the same sites showed that most taxa whose probability of occurrence was ≥0.5 could be found with more intensive sampling. 5. Reducing the number of variables used in making the predictions from twenty‐eight to five resulted in only a slight loss of predictive accuracy. 6. Combinations of chemical and physical variables gave better predictions than equivalent numbers of physical variables only but the latter may be more appropriate where chemical pollution is known, or suspected to occur. 7. The procedure is of practical value in the detection and assessment of pollution. 8. It may also be used to explore patterns in the structure and functioning of stream communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., & Cushing, C. E. (1980) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f80-017 · Cited by 9,984
Cited by
Poff, N. L. (1997) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.2307/1468026 · Cited by 1,833
Reynoldson, T. B., Norris, R. H., Resh, V. H., Day, K. E., & Rosenberg, D. M. (1997) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.2307/1468175 · Cited by 641
Ecological Assessments with Algae: A Review and Synthesis
Stevenson, J. (2014) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1111/jpy.12189 · Cited by 273
Large‐scale, long‐term trends in British river macroinvertebrates
Vaughan, I. P., & Ormerod, S. J. (2012) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02662.x · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- MOSS, D., FURSE, M. T., WRIGHT, J. F., & ARMITAGE, P. D.
- Venue
- Freshwater Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-52
- ISSN
- 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2427
- OpenAlex
- W2006537386
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prediction of the macro‐invertebrate fauna of unpolluted running‐water sites in Great Britain using environmental data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1987.tb01027.x
- The paper
- MOSS, D., FURSE, M. T., WRIGHT, J. F., & ARMITAGE, P. D. (1987). The prediction of the macro‐invertebrate fauna of unpolluted running‐water sites in Great Britain using environmental data. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1987.tb01027.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.