The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A fuzzy coding approach for the analysis of long‐term ecological data
Abstract
SUMMARY: We present an unconventional procedure (fuzzy coding) to structure biological and environmental information, which uses positive scores to describe the affinity of a species for different modalities (i.e. categories) of a given variable. Fuzzy coding is essential for the synthesis of long‐term ecological data because it enables analysis of diverse kinds of biological information derived from a variety of sources (e.g. samples, literature). A fuzzy coded table can be processed by correspondence analysis. An example using aquatic beetles illustrates the properties of such a fuzzy correspondence analysis. Fuzzy coded tables were used in all articles of this issue to examine relationships between spatial‐temporal habitat variability and species traits, which were obtained from a long‐term study of the Upper Rhône River, France. Fuzzy correspondence analysis can be programmed with the equations given in this paper or can be performed using ADE (Environmental Data Analysis) software that has been adapted to analyse such long‐term ecological data. On Macintosh Apple TM computers, ADE performs simple linear ordination, more recently developed methods (e.g. principal component analysis with respect to instrumental variables, canonical correspondence analysis, co‐inertia analysis, local and spatial analyses), and provides a graphical display of results of these and other types of analysis (e.g. biplot, mapping, modelling curves). ADE consists of a program library that exploits the potential of the HyperCard TM interface. ADE in an open system, which offers the user a variety of facilities to create a specific sequence of programs. The mathematical background of ADE is supported by the algebraic model known as ‘duality diagram’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software
Thioulouse, J., Chessel, D., Dole´dec, S., & Olivier, J.-M. (1997) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1023/a:1018513530268 · Cited by 1,620
Self-citationMatching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method
Dolédec, S., Chessel, D., ter Braak, C. J. F., & Champely, S. (1996) · Environmental and Ecological Statistics · doi:10.1007/bf02427859 · Cited by 731
Self-citationCWM and Rao’s quadratic diversity: a unified framework for functional ecology
Ricotta, C., & Moretti, M. (2011) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-011-1965-5 · Cited by 594
BONADA, N., DOLÉDEC, S., & STATZNER, B. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01375.x · Cited by 438
Menezes, S., Baird, D. J., & Soares, A. M. V. M. (2010) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01819.x · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- CHEVENE, F., DOLÉADEC, S., & CHESSEL, D.
- Venue
- Freshwater Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-309
- ISSN
- 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2427
- OpenAlex
- W1987650700
- Cited by
- 1,008
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A fuzzy coding approach for the analysis of long‐term ecological data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01742.x
- The paper
- CHEVENE, F., DOLÉADEC, S., & CHESSEL, D. (1994). A fuzzy coding approach for the analysis of long‐term ecological data. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01742.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.