The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biogeographic barriers, connectivity and homogenization of freshwater faunas: it's a small world after all
Abstract
Summary: 1. Historically, biogeographic barriers to the movement of aquatic organisms existed at multiple spatial scales and contributed to the development of unique regional faunas. At increasing spatial scales, these barriers consisted of waterfalls and cascades; catchment divides; major mountain ranges and oceans. This hierarchy of movement barriers produced increasingly distinct aquatic biotas at larger drainage units. 2. Humans have provided a variety of pathways by which aquatic species can circumvent historical biogeographic barriers. These include both authorised and unauthorised stocking, construction of canals and water conveyance systems, transport in ship ballast water, fishing and angling gear (including boats) transferred among water bodies and intentional release of ornamental and other captive species. 3. One consequence of human‐aided breaching of biogeographic barriers has been the spread of noxious species that have altered aquatic ecosystems and fisheries in ways that are undesirable to humans. 4. Another consequence of human‐aided breaching of biogeographic barriers has been the homogenization of aquatic biotas. Homogenization occurs when a few cosmopolitan species come to dominate communities at the expense of unique native species. Among aquatic organisms this phenomenon is best documented for fish faunas where a small set of species introduced for sport fishing, aquaculture, or ornamental purposes have become widespread throughout the world. 5. Slowing biotic homogenization will require slowing the rate at which species breach biogeographic barriers. This will involve implementing regulations that limit stocking opportunities; increasing the public's awareness about the consequences of releasing non‐native species and developing technological solutions that prevent movement of aquatic organisms or eliminate them before they become established. 6. River restoration can influence homogenization of aquatic biotas through two major mechanisms: by removing barriers to movement and by restoring natural habitat conditions. Removal of movement barriers may facilitate the spread of non‐native species and thus contribute to biotic homogenization. Restoration of natural flow regimes and habitat conditions may reduce biotic homogenization by favouring regional native species over cosmopolitan, non‐native species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization
McKinney, M. L. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005 · Cited by 3,841
Streams in the Urban Landscape
Paul, M. J., & Meyer, J. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040 · Cited by 2,795
Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction
McKinney, M. L., & Lockwood, J. L. (1999) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01679-1 · Cited by 2,707
Streams in the Urban Landscape
Paul, M. J., & Meyer, J. L. (2008) · Urban Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_12 · Cited by 2,194
Invasive species in a changing world
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-4448 · Cited by 1,704
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-2804 · Cited by 939
Fishes: An Introduction to Ichthyology
Mattingly, H. T., Moyle, P. B., Cech, J. J., & Bond, C. E. (1996) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1447679 · Cited by 856
Homogenization of Freshwater Faunas
Rahel, F. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150429 · Cited by 852
Self-citationBiogeography: An Ecological and Evolutionary Approach.
Cox, C. B., Healey, I. N., & Moore, P. D. (1977) · Systematic Botany · doi:10.2307/2418264 · Cited by 804
Homogenization of Fish Faunas Across the United States
Rahel, F. J. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5467.854 · Cited by 721
Self-citation
Cited by
Assessing the Effects of Climate Change on Aquatic Invasive Species
RAHEL, F. J., & OLDEN, J. D. (2008) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00950.x · Cited by 1,303
Self-citationThe science and practice of river restoration
Wohl, E., Lane, S. N., & Wilcox, A. C. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2014wr016874 · Cited by 710
Kondolf, G. M., Boulton, A. J., O'Daniel, S., Poole, G. C., Rahel, F. J., Stanley, E. H., Wohl, E., Bång, A., Carlstrom, J., Cristoni, C., et al. (2006) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01747-110205 · Cited by 537
Self-citationConservation biogeography of freshwater fishes: recent progress and future challenges
Olden, J. D., Kennard, M. J., Leprieur, F., Tedesco, P. A., Winemiller, K. O., & García‐Berthou, E. (2010) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00655.x · Cited by 403
Hydrological connectivity for riverine fish: measurement challenges and research opportunities
FULLERTON, A. H., BURNETT, K. M., STEEL, E. A., FLITCROFT, R. L., PESS, G. R., FEIST, B. E., TORGERSEN, C. E., MILLER, D. J., & SANDERSON, B. L. (2010) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02448.x · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- RAHEL, F. J.
- Venue
- Freshwater Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-02
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 696-710
- ISSN
- 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2427
- OpenAlex
- W2159701866
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 16.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biogeographic barriers, connectivity and homogenization of freshwater faunas: it's a small world after all. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01708.x
- The paper
- RAHEL, F. J. (2007). Biogeographic barriers, connectivity and homogenization of freshwater faunas: it's a small world after all. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01708.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.