The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of ecological status in U.K. rivers using diatoms
Abstract
Summary: 1. The European Union's Water Framework Directive requires all water bodies to achieve ‘good ecological status’ by 2015 and this paper describes a rationale for defining ‘good ecological status’ based on diatoms, a significant component of the biological quality element ‘macrophyte and phytobenthos’. 2. A database of benthic diatom samples collected over the past 20 years was assembled. New sampling, specifically for this project, was undertaken during 2004 to supplement these data. In total 1051 samples were included in the database with matching environmental data. 3. ‘Reference sites’, relatively unimpacted by human activity, were selected from this database by a series of screening steps and these sites were used to develop a site‐specific reference typology. 4. Environmental variables not related to the pressure gradient were used to predict the ‘expected’ Trophic Diatom Index (TDI) values at each site. Site‐specific TDI predictions were used to generate ecological quality ratios (EQRs) ranging from ≥1, where the diatom assemblage showed no impact, to (theoretically) 0, when the diatom assemblage was indicative of major anthropogenic activities. 5. The boundary between ‘high’ and ‘good’ status was defined as the 25th percentile of EQRs of all reference sites. The boundary between ‘good’ and ‘moderate’ status was set at the point at which nutrient‐sensitive and nutrient‐tolerant taxa were present in equal relative abundance. An ecological rationale for this threshold is outlined in the paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists
Quinn, G. P., & Keough, M. J. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806384 · Cited by 10,674
SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AND INDICATOR SPECIES:THE NEED FOR A FLEXIBLE ASYMMETRICAL APPROACH
Dufrêne, M., & Legendre, P. (1997) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0345:saaist]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 7,431
Crawley, M. J. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470515075 · Cited by 3,920
The Diatoms. Biology and Morphology of the Genera.
Theriot, E., Herbarium, D., Round, F. E., Crawford, R. M., & Mann, D. G. (1992) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.2307/2992511 · Cited by 2,261
The Diatoms. Biology and Morphology of the Genera
Christensen, T. (1991) · Phycologia · doi:10.2216/i0031-8884-30-2-233.1 · Cited by 2,031
Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems
Stevenson, R. J., Bothwell, M. L., & Lowe, R. L. (1996) · Cited by 1,315
Design and analysis of ecological experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1994) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90324-7 · Cited by 1,312
Gallagher, C. (2007) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2007.s238 · Cited by 1,070
SETTING EXPECTATIONS FOR THE ECOLOGICAL CONDITION OF STREAMS: THE CONCEPT OF REFERENCE CONDITION
Stoddard, J. L., Larsen, D. P., Hawkins, C. P., Johnson, R. K., & Norris, R. H. (2006) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1267:seftec]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,016
Cited by
Jarvie, H. P., Sharpley, A. N., Withers, P. J. A., Scott, J. T., Haggard, B. E., & Neal, C. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2012.0085 · Cited by 311
Ecological Assessments with Algae: A Review and Synthesis
Stevenson, J. (2014) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1111/jpy.12189 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- KELLY, M., JUGGINS, S., GUTHRIE, R., PRITCHARD, S., JAMIESON, J., RIPPEY, B., HIRST, H., & YALLOP, M.
- Venue
- Freshwater Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11-04
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 403-422
- ISSN
- 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2427
- OpenAlex
- W1993336263
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of ecological status in U.K. rivers using diatoms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01903.x
- The paper
- KELLY, M., JUGGINS, S., GUTHRIE, R., PRITCHARD, S., JAMIESON, J., RIPPEY, B., HIRST, H., & YALLOP, M. (2008). Assessment of ecological status in U.K. rivers using diatoms. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01903.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.