Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 499

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A morphological classification capturing functional variation in phytoplankton

Open access
KRUK, CARLA, HUSZAR, VERA L. M., PEETERS, EDWIN T. H. M., BONILLA, SYLVIA, COSTA, LUCIANA, LÜRLING, MIQUEL, REYNOLDS, COLIN S., SCHEFFER, MARTEN·2010·Freshwater Biology

Abstract

Summary: 1. A logical way of distinguishing functional groups of phytoplankton is to cluster species according to their functional traits, such as growth rate and nutrient assimilation constants. However, data for such an approach are lacking for the vast majority of the species. 2. In this study, we show that a classification based on simple morphological traits may capture much of the variability in functional properties among the phytoplankton. We used information on more than 700 freshwater species, from more than 200 lakes situated in climate zones ranging from subpolar to tropical. 3. Morphological characteristics correlated well with functional properties, such as growth rate and sinking rate, and also with the population size and biomass attained in the field. This suggests that morphology is a good predictor of the functional characteristics of species. 4. Cluster analysis was used to define seven species groups based on morphology. Although some of the clusters are taxonomically homogeneous, others include species of several separate divisions. Functional traits (not used for the classification) differed significantly among the clusters, suggesting that the clusters may indeed represent meaningful functional groups. 5. Advantages of our morphological approach to classification include its objectivity, its independence from taxonomic affiliations, and the relative ease of its application to the majority of species for which physiological traits are unknown and are not readily determined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02298.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 499

Metadata

Authors
KRUK, C., HUSZAR, V. L. M., PEETERS, E. T. H. M., BONILLA, S., COSTA, L., LÜRLING, M., REYNOLDS, C. S., & SCHEFFER, M.
Venue
Freshwater Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02-22
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
614-627
ISSN
  • 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2427
OpenAlex
W2001200569
Cited by
499
References
0
FWCI
12.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A morphological classification capturing functional variation in phytoplankton. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02298.x
The paper
KRUK, C., HUSZAR, V. L. M., PEETERS, E. T. H. M., BONILLA, S., COSTA, L., LÜRLING, M., REYNOLDS, C. S., & SCHEFFER, M. (2010). A morphological classification capturing functional variation in phytoplankton. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02298.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.