The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A morphological classification capturing functional variation in phytoplankton
Open accessAbstract
Summary: 1. A logical way of distinguishing functional groups of phytoplankton is to cluster species according to their functional traits, such as growth rate and nutrient assimilation constants. However, data for such an approach are lacking for the vast majority of the species. 2. In this study, we show that a classification based on simple morphological traits may capture much of the variability in functional properties among the phytoplankton. We used information on more than 700 freshwater species, from more than 200 lakes situated in climate zones ranging from subpolar to tropical. 3. Morphological characteristics correlated well with functional properties, such as growth rate and sinking rate, and also with the population size and biomass attained in the field. This suggests that morphology is a good predictor of the functional characteristics of species. 4. Cluster analysis was used to define seven species groups based on morphology. Although some of the clusters are taxonomically homogeneous, others include species of several separate divisions. Functional traits (not used for the classification) differed significantly among the clusters, suggesting that the clusters may indeed represent meaningful functional groups. 5. Advantages of our morphological approach to classification include its objectivity, its independence from taxonomic affiliations, and the relative ease of its application to the majority of species for which physiological traits are unknown and are not readily determined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mitra, A., Flynn, K. J., Tillmann, U., Raven, J. A., Caron, D., Stoecker, D. K., Not, F., Hansen, P. J., Hallegraeff, G., Sanders, R., et al. (2016) · Protist · doi:10.1016/j.protis.2016.01.003 · Cited by 425
Linking traits to species diversity and community structure in phytoplankton
Litchman, E., de Tezanos Pinto, P., Klausmeier, C. A., Thomas, M. K., & Yoshiyama, K. (2010) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-010-0341-5 · Cited by 309
Storm impacts on phytoplankton community dynamics in lakes
Stockwell, J. D., Doubek, J. P., Adrian, R., Anneville, O., Carey, C. C., Carvalho, L., De Senerpont Domis, L. N., Dur, G., Frassl, M. A., Grossart, H., et al. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15033 · Cited by 293
Functional classifications and their application in phytoplankton ecology
Salmaso, N., Naselli‐Flores, L., & Padisák, J. (2015) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/fwb.12520 · Cited by 253
Underwater dual-magnification imaging for automated lake plankton monitoring
Merz, E., Kozakiewicz, T., Reyes, M., Ebi, C., Isles, P., Baity-Jesi, M., Roberts, P., Jaffe, J. S., Dennis, S. R., Hardeman, T., et al. (2021) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2021.117524 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- KRUK, C., HUSZAR, V. L. M., PEETERS, E. T. H. M., BONILLA, S., COSTA, L., LÜRLING, M., REYNOLDS, C. S., & SCHEFFER, M.
- Venue
- Freshwater Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02-22
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 614-627
- ISSN
- 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2427
- OpenAlex
- W2001200569
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A morphological classification capturing functional variation in phytoplankton. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02298.x
- The paper
- KRUK, C., HUSZAR, V. L. M., PEETERS, E. T. H. M., BONILLA, S., COSTA, L., LÜRLING, M., REYNOLDS, C. S., & SCHEFFER, M. (2010). A morphological classification capturing functional variation in phytoplankton. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02298.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.