Soil carbon stocks in experimental mesocosms are dependent on the rate of labile carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to soils
Abstract
1 The soil sink for carbon is important in regulating climate and soil fertility. The sink strength is dependent on the balance of soil carbon decomposition and formation. Variation in the rates of these processes to manipulations of resource availabilities under global change, such as elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide, is not explained by soil microbial theory. 2 To investigate disparate responses of soil carbon dynamics in field investigations, to altered carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus availability, we couple fractionation, isotope and mesocosm techniques to quantify soil carbon decomposition and formation under different resource regimes. These regimes involve addition of multiple levels of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus, alone and in combination. 3 We hypothesize that: (i) there is no net effect of labile carbon input rate on soil carbon stocks because reductions in soil carbon decomposition are offset by reductions in soil carbon formation; (ii) with simultaneous nutrient addition soil carbon stocks will increase because nitrogen will inhibit further soil carbon decomposition, and mitigate reductions in soil carbon formation observed under elevated labile carbon availability alone; (iii) this increase in soil carbon stocks will be a product of greater formation and decreased decomposition of slower-cycling, mineral-associated, soil carbon, whereas less stable, particulate soil carbon will simply turnover faster (due to greater soil carbon decomposition and formation)…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization
Mack, M. C., Schuur, E. A. G., Bret-Harte, M. S., Shaver, G. R., & Chapin, F. S. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02887 · Cited by 1,030 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Microbial formation of stable soil carbon is more efficient from belowground than aboveground input
Sokol, N. W., & Bradford, M. A. (2019) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0258-6 · Cited by 891 · see citing works
Self-citationMesocosm Experiments as a Tool for Ecological Climate-Change Research
Stewart, R. I. A., Dossena, M., Bohan, D. A., Jeppesen, E., Kordas, R. L., Ledger, M. E., Meerhoff, M., Moss, B., Mulder, C., Shurin, J. B., et al. (2013) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417199-2.00002-1 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Grover, S., Anderson, H. M., Fleck, J., Kelly, C. N., Schuler, J., Ruark, M. D., & Freedman, Z. B. (2024) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.1002/saj2.20647 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bradford, M. A., Fierer, N., & Reynolds, J. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bradford, M. A.
- Venue
- Functional Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-11-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 964-974
- ISSN
- 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2435
- OpenAlex
- W2147629723
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 13.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Functional Ecology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Keywords
- soil organic carbon, nitrogen addition, phosphorus addition, soil carbon decomposition, soil carbon fractions, mineral-associated organic carbon, particulate organic carbon, rhizodeposition, elevated CO2, global change, nutrient interactions, isotope fractionation, mesocosm experiment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review