The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimizing stomatal conductance for maximum carbon gain under water stress: a meta-analysis across plant functional types and climates: Optimal leaf gas exchange under water stress
Open accessAbstract
1. Quantification of stomatal responses to environmental variables, in particular to soil water status, is needed to model carbon and water exchange rates between plants and the atmosphere. 2. Models based on stomatal optimality theory successfully describe leaf gas exchange under different environmental conditions, but the effects of water availability on the key optimization parameter [the marginal water use efficiency (WUE), λ = ∂A/∂E] has resisted complete theoretical treatment. Building on previous optimal leaf gas exchange models, we developed an analytical equation to estimate λ from gas exchange observations along gradients of soil water availability. This expression was then used in a meta-analysis of about 50 species to investigate patterns of variation in λ. 3. Assuming that cuticular water losses are negligible λ increases under mild water stress but decreases when severe water stress limits photosynthesis. When cuticular conductance is considered, however, λ increases monotonically with increasing water stress, in agreement with previous theoretical predictions. Moreover, the shape of these response curves to soil water availability changes with plant functional type and climatic conditions. In general, λ is lower in species grown in dry climates, indicating lower marginal WUE. 4. The proposed parameterization provides a framework to assess the responses of leaf gas exchange to changes in water availability. Moreover, the model can be extended to scale leaf-level fluxes to the canopy and ecosystem level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
C4 photosynthesis and water stress.
Ghannoum, O. (2008) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn093 · Cited by 538
Cited by
Prentice, I. C., Dong, N., Gleason, S. M., Maire, V., & Wright, I. J. (2014) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12211 · Cited by 526
Sperry, J. S., Venturas, M. D., Anderegg, W. R. L., Mencuccini, M., Mackay, D. S., Wang, Y., & Love, D. M. (2017) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12852 · Cited by 425
Tree carbon allocation explains forest drought‐kill and recovery patterns
Trugman, A. T., Detto, M., Bartlett, M. K., Medvigy, D., Anderegg, W. R. L., Schwalm, C., Schaffer, B., & Pacala, S. W. (2018) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.13136 · Cited by 341
Stomatal responses to drought stress
Pirasteh‐Anosheh, H., Saed‐Moucheshi, A., Pakniyat, H., & Pessarakli, M. (2016) · Water Stress and Crop Plants · doi:10.1002/9781119054450.ch3 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Manzoni, S., Vico, G., Katul, G., Fay, P. A., Polley, W., Palmroth, S., & Porporato, A.
- Venue
- Functional Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-25
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 456-467
- ISSN
- 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120284277
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimizing stomatal conductance for maximum carbon gain under water stress: a meta-analysis across plant functional types and climates: Optimal leaf gas exchange under water stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01822.x
- The paper
- Manzoni, S., Vico, G., Katul, G., Fay, P. A., Polley, W., Palmroth, S., & Porporato, A. (2011). Optimizing stomatal conductance for maximum carbon gain under water stress: a meta-analysis across plant functional types and climates: Optimal leaf gas exchange under water stress. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01822.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.