The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The temperature‐size rule emerges from ontogenetic differences between growth and development rates
Abstract
Summary: 1. The temperature‐size rule (TSR) is a widespread phenomenon, which describes the phenotypic plastic response of species’ size to temperature: individuals reared at colder temperatures mature as larger adults than at warmer temperatures. 2. The TSR is driven by an unequal thermal response of growth and development rates. However, we currently lack an understanding of how these rates change through ontogeny and their decoupling. Further, we do not know how this decoupling varies across generations. 3. Using the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana as a model, we examine growth and development rates through ontogeny at different temperatures across two generations. 4. The slopes of natural‐logged weight‐specific growth rates against temperature are steeper in earlier than later larval stages, indicating their greater temperature dependence, whereas development rates maintain the same temperature dependence across life stages. An inverse TSR is generated in early larval stages; the typical TSR (smaller size at warmer temperatures) is only established later in ontogeny. 5. Phase‐specific temperature dependence of growth and development rates is not significantly different across the 1st and 2nd generation, suggesting the TSR is primarily a within‐generation outcome. 6. Ontogenetic size responses in Artemia are compared to other crustacean species to identify patterns within this subphylum. Data for a range of crustaceans follow the same ontogenetic pattern: early larval stages show an inverse or no TSR, with TSR being only established in later stages. Adults often, but not always, show the greatest response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
O'Connor, M. I., Bruno, J. F., Gaines, S. D., Halpern, B. S., Lester, S. E., Kinlan, B. P., & Weiss, J. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0603422104 · Cited by 924
Cited by
Mesocosm Experiments as a Tool for Ecological Climate-Change Research
Stewart, R. I. A., Dossena, M., Bohan, D. A., Jeppesen, E., Kordas, R. L., Ledger, M. E., Meerhoff, M., Moss, B., Mulder, C., Shurin, J. B., et al. (2013) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417199-2.00002-1 · Cited by 387
Verberk, W. C. E. P., Atkinson, D., Hoefnagel, K. N., Hirst, A. G., Horne, C. R., & Siepel, H. (2021) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12653 · Cited by 363
Self-citationSinai, N., Glos, J., Mohan, A. V., Lyra, M. L., Riepe, M., Thöle, E., Zummach, C., & Ruthsatz, K. (2022) · Journal of Thermal Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtherbio.2022.103233 · Cited by 45
Horváthová, T., Antol, A., Czarnoleski, M., Kramarz, P., Bauchinger, U., Labecka, A., & Kozłowski, J. (2015) · ZooKeys · doi:10.3897/zookeys.515.9353 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Forster, J., & Hirst, A. G.
- Venue
- Functional Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-01-27
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 483-492
- ISSN
- 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2435
- OpenAlex
- W1490829282
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The temperature‐size rule emerges from ontogenetic differences between growth and development rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01958.x
- The paper
- Forster, J., & Hirst, A. G. (2012). The temperature‐size rule emerges from ontogenetic differences between growth and development rates. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01958.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.