The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Kuril Trench - Hokkaido Rise System: Large Shallow Earthquakes and Simple Models of Deformation
Abstract
Large shallow earthquakes of the Kuril Trench are distinct from those of the adjacent Aleutian Trench in two important ways: in the case of the Kuril events, (1) the rate of occurrence of events near or oceanward of the trench axis with tensional focal mechanisms is markedly lower and (2) the average apparent stress of 14 shallow events is almost an order of magnitude higher. An explanation of these observations is that the oceanic lithosphere forming the Kuril Trench-Hokkaido Rise system is acted upon by a horizontal compressive stress of several kilobars in a direction normal to the Kuril Trench axis. Calculations based on simple models of elastic deformation support this explanation. Unless the Kuril oceanic lithosphere has a strong nonelastic response on a time scale of a few million years, a horizontal compressive stress of approximately several kilobars is necessary to maintain the Kuril Trench-Hokkaido Rise bathymetry. The oceanic lithosphere in this region has an effective (elastic) thickness of 30–40 km and is capable of supporting deviatoric compressive stresses of several kilobars. The elastic thickness of the Kuril oceanic lithosphere agrees well with the seismic thickness of the lithosphere descending beneath the Tonga arc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Some remarks on heat flow and gravity anomalies
McKenzie, D. P. (1967) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jz072i024p06261 · Cited by 751
Mantle Earthquake Mechanisms and the Sinking of the Lithosphere
ISACKS, B., & MOLNAR, P. (1969) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2231121a0 · Cited by 341
Cited by
On the relative importance of the driving forces of plate motion
Forsyth, D., & Uyeda, S. (1975) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1975.tb00631.x · Cited by 1,673
Back‐arc opening and the mode of subduction
Uyeda, S., & Kanamori, H. (1979) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb084ib03p01049 · Cited by 1,286
Richardson, R. M., Solomon, S. C., & Sleep, N. H. (1979) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/rg017i005p00981 · Cited by 371
Effects of plate bending and fault strength at subduction zones on plate dynamics
Conrad, C. P., & Hager, B. H. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/1999jb900149 · Cited by 293
Thrust faulting at a lithospheric plate boundary the Portugal earthquake of 1969
Fukao, Y. (1973) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(73)90058-7 · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanks, T. C.
- Venue
- Geophysical Journal International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1971-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-189
- ISSN
- 0956-540X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-246X
- OpenAlex
- W2117377125
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Kuril Trench - Hokkaido Rise System: Large Shallow Earthquakes and Simple Models of Deformation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1971.tb01811.x
- The paper
- Hanks, T. C. (1971). The Kuril Trench - Hokkaido Rise System: Large Shallow Earthquakes and Simple Models of Deformation. Geophysical Journal International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1971.tb01811.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.