Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 798

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Interpretation of Inaccurate, Insufficient and Inconsistent Data

Jackson, D. D.·1972·Geophysical Journal International

Abstract

Many problems in physical science involve the estimation of a number of unknown parameters which bear a linear or quasi-linear relationship to a set of experimental data. The data may be contaminated by random errors, insufficient to determine the unknowns, redundant, or all of the above. This paper presents a method of optimizing the conclusions from such a data set. The problem is formulated as an ill-posed matrix equation, and general criteria are established for constructing an ‘inverse’ matrix. The ‘solution’ to the problem is defined in terms of a set of generalized eigenvectors of the matrix, and may be chosen to optimize the resolution provided by the data, the expected error in the solution, the fit to the data, the proximity of the solution to an arbitrary function, or any combination of the above. The classical ‘least-squares’ solution is discussed as a special case.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1972.tb06115.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 798

Metadata

Authors
Jackson, D. D.
Venue
Geophysical Journal International
Published
1972-06-01
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
97-109
ISSN
  • 0956-540X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-246X
OpenAlex
W2105403290
Cited by
798
References
0
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interpretation of Inaccurate, Insufficient and Inconsistent Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1972.tb06115.x
The paper
Jackson, D. D. (1972). Interpretation of Inaccurate, Insufficient and Inconsistent Data. Geophysical Journal International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1972.tb06115.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.