Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Galapagos Spreading Centre: Lithospheric Cooling and Hydrothermal Circulation

Williams, D. L., Von Herzen, R. P., Sclater, J. G., Anderson, R. N.·1974·Geophysical Journal International

Abstract

The spatial pattern of cooling near a spreading ridge crest was investigated with a suite of 71 precisely-navigated heat-flow stations on the Galapagos spreading centre, East Pacific, near 86°W longitude. Stations are on crust less than 1.0 My old on which bathymetry and sediment distribution are well known. Values vary from near zero to greater than 30 HFU (10−6 cal cm−2 s−1). The average over the entire region is significantly less than that predicted by theoretical conduction models of a cooling lithosphere. We observe a regular variation of the heat-flow pattern with a wavelength of 6 ± 1 km approximately normal to the ridge crest. Heat-flow maxima are characteristically located near faults and local topographic highs. The locations of fields of small sediment mounds, apparently hydrothermal vents, are also restricted to these faulted, elevated areas of high heat flow. Near-axis, bottom water temperature anomalies of several hundredths °C were detected. The low average, the low minima in the heat-flow pattern, and the water temperature anomalies suggest that hydrothermal circulation accounts for approximately 80 per cent of the geothermal heat released near the ridge crest. We conclude that the hydrothermal circulation pattern is controlled by one or more of the following physical properties of the system: highly developed cellular convection, discrete zones of high permeability, variation in the strength of heat sources near the base of the crust, or bottom topography. Our results imply that heat-flow studies near active oceanic ridges will be of most value if they are sufficiently detailed and well navigated to define the systematic small-scale variations that appear to be caused by hydrothermal circulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1974.tb05431.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Williams, D. L., Von Herzen, R. P., Sclater, J. G., & Anderson, R. N.
Venue
Geophysical Journal International
Published
1974-09-01
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
587-608
ISSN
  • 0956-540X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-246X
OpenAlex
W2156437513
Cited by
321
References
1
FWCI
43.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.