The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Source shape estimation and deconvolution of teleseismic bodywaves
Open accessAbstract
We consider the deconvolution of a suite of teleseismic recordings of the same event in order to separate source and transmission path phenomena. The assumption of source uniformity may restrict the range of azimuths and distances of the seismograms included in the suite. The source shape is estimated by separately averaging the log amplitude spectra and the phase spectra of the recordings. This method of source estimation uses the redundant source information contained in secondary arrivals. The necessary condition for this estimator to resolve the source wavelet is that the travel times of the various secondary arrivals be evenly distributed with respect to the initial arrivals. The subsequent deconvolution of the seismograms is carried out by spectral division with two modifications. The first is the introduction of a minimum allowable source spectral amplitude termed the waterlevel. This parameter constrains the gain of the deconvolution filter in regions where the seismogram has little or no information, and also trades-off arrival time resolution with arrival amplitude resolution. The second modification, designed to increase the time domain resolution of the deconvolution, is the extension of the frequency range of the transmission path impulse response spectrum beyond the optimal passband (the passband of the seismograms). The justification for the extension lies in the fact that the impulse response of the transmission path is itself a series of impulses which means its spectrum is not band-limited. Thus, the impulse response is best represented by a continuous spectrum rather than one which is set to zero outside the optimal passband. This continuity is achieved by a recursive application of a unit-step prediction operator determined by Burg's maximum entropy algorithm. The envelopes of the deconvolution are used to detect the presence of phase shifted arrivals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wiggins, R. A. (1978) · Geoexploration · doi:10.1016/0016-7142(78)90005-4 · Cited by 960
Self-citationOn the nonuniqueness of receiver function inversions
Ammon, C. J., Randall, G. E., & Zandt, G. (1990) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb095ib10p15303 · Cited by 800
Transdimensional inversion of receiver functions and surface wave dispersion
Bodin, T., Sambridge, M., Gallagher, K., & Rawlinson, N. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2011jb008560 · Cited by 462
Receiver Functions from Multiple-Taper Spectral Correlation Estimates
Park, J. (2000) · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America · doi:10.1785/0119990122 · Cited by 294
Thickness and structure of the martian crust from InSight seismic data
Knapmeyer-Endrun, B., Panning, M. P., Bissig, F., Joshi, R., Khan, A., Kim, D., Lekić, V., Tauzin, B., Tharimena, S., Plasman, M., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abf8966 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Clayton, R. W., & Wiggins, R. A.
- Venue
- Geophysical Journal International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1976-10-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 151-177
- ISSN
- 0956-540X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-246X
- OpenAlex
- W2125158311
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Source shape estimation and deconvolution of teleseismic bodywaves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1976.tb01267.x
- The paper
- Clayton, R. W., & Wiggins, R. A. (1976). Source shape estimation and deconvolution of teleseismic bodywaves. Geophysical Journal International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1976.tb01267.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.