The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The magnitude, symmetry and origin of upper mantle anisotropy based on fabric analyses of ultramafic tectonites
Open accessAbstract
Seismic anisotropy within the upper mantle originates from the preferred orientation of highly anisotropic single crystals. The symmetry and magnitude of anisotropy depend upon: (1) the volume percentages of the minerals constituting the upper mantle, (2) the degree and symmetry of preferred orientation of each mineral and (3) the alignment of the minerals' crystallographic axes relative to one another. The nature of upper mantle anisotropy can be examined by studying mineral orientations within ultramafic rocks which were once part of the mantle. Petrofabric data for olivine and pyroxene have been used to obtain velocity anisotropy patterns over large regions of ultramafic rocks from the Samail ophiolite, Oman, the Troodos ophiolite, Cyprus, the Bay of Islands ophiolife, Newfoundland, the Twin Sisters ultramafic, Washington, USA, the Dun Mountain ophiolite, New Zealand, the Red Hills ophiolite, New Zealand and the Red Mountain ophiolite, New Zealand. The compressional wave anisotropy calculated for these massifs ranges from 3 to 8 per cent, in excellent agreement with observed seismic anisotropy in the upper continental and oceanic mantle. The symmetry varies from orthorhombic to axial, with the axial symmetry axis corresponding to the olivine a-axes maxima and subparallel to spreading directions in oceanic upper mantle. Pyroxene a-, b- and c-axes maxima generally parallel olivine b-, c- and a-axes, respectively, and anisotropy decreases with increasing pyroxene content. Shear-wave splitting is predicted for all propagation directions within the upper mantle. Symmetry is also orthorhombic or axial, with the minimum difference in velocity between the two shear-waves parallel to the maximum compressional wave velocity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shear wave splitting and subcontinental mantle deformation
Silver, P. G., & Chan, W. W. (1991) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/91jb00899 · Cited by 1,587
Seismic anisotropy and mantle deformation: What have we learned from shear wave splitting?
Savage, M. K. (1999) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/98rg02075 · Cited by 1,312
SEISMIC ANISOTROPY BENEATH THE CONTINENTS: Probing the Depths of Geology
Silver, P. G. (1996) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.24.1.385 · Cited by 1,279
Formation of anisotropy in upper mantle peridotites: A review
Nicolas, A., & Christensen, N. I. (1987) · Geodynamics Series · doi:10.1029/gd016p0111 · Cited by 710
Self-citationRheology of the lithosphere: Selected topics
Kirby, S. H., & Kronenberg, A. K. (1987) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/rg025i006p01219 · Cited by 695
Metadata
- Authors
- Christensen, N. I.
- Venue
- Geophysical Journal International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984-01-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-111
- ISSN
- 0956-540X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-246X
- OpenAlex
- W2021159034
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The magnitude, symmetry and origin of upper mantle anisotropy based on fabric analyses of ultramafic tectonites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1984.tb05025.x
- The paper
- Christensen, N. I. (1984). The magnitude, symmetry and origin of upper mantle anisotropy based on fabric analyses of ultramafic tectonites. Geophysical Journal International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1984.tb05025.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.