The DOI matches its Crossref record.
P-SH conversions in a flat-layered medium with anisotropy of arbitrary orientation
Open accessAbstract
P-SH conversion is commonly observed in teleseismic P waves, and is often attributed to dipping interfaces beneath the receiver. Our modelling suggests an alternative explanation in terms of flat-layered anisotropy. We use reflectivity techniques to compute three-component synthetic seismograms in a 1-D anisotropic layered medium. For each layer of the medium, we prescribe values of seismic velocities and hexagonally symmetric anisotropy about a common symmetry axis of arbitrary orientation. A compressional wave in an anisotropic velocity structure suffers conversion to both SV-and SH-polarized shear waves, unless the axis of symmetry is everywhere vertical or the wave travels parallel to all symmetry axes. The P-SV conversion forms the basis of the widely used ‘receiver function’ technique. The P-SH conversion occurs at interfaces where one or both layers are anisotropic. A tilted axis of symmetry and a dipping interface in isotropic media produce similar amplitudes of both direct (P) and converted (Ps) phases, leaving the backazimuth variation of the P-Ps delay as the main discriminant. Seismic anisotropy with a tilted symmetry axis leads to complex synthetic seismograms in velocity models composed of just a few flat homogeneous layers. It is possible therefore to model observations of P coda with prominent transverse components with relatively simple 1-D velocity structures. Successful retrieval of salient model characteristics appears possible using multiple realizations of a genetic-algorithm (GA) inversion of P coda from several backazimuths. Using GA inversion, we determine that six P coda recorded at station ARU in central Russia are consistent with models that possess strong (> 10 per cent) anisotropy in the top 5 km and between 30 and 43 km depth. The symmetry axes are tilted, and appear aligned with the seismic anisotropy orientation in the mantle under ARU suggested by SKS splitting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Seismic anisotropy and mantle deformation: What have we learned from shear wave splitting?
Savage, M. K. (1999) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/98rg02075 · Cited by 1,312
MONTE CARLO METHODS IN GEOPHYSICAL INVERSE PROBLEMS
Sambridge, M., & Mosegaard, K. (2002) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2000rg000089 · Cited by 829
Transdimensional inversion of receiver functions and surface wave dispersion
Bodin, T., Sambridge, M., Gallagher, K., & Rawlinson, N. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2011jb008560 · Cited by 462
North American lithospheric discontinuity structure imaged by Ps and Sp receiver functions
Abt, D. L., Fischer, K. M., French, S. W., Ford, H. A., Yuan, H., & Romanowicz, B. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2009jb006914 · Cited by 318
Receiver Functions from Multiple-Taper Spectral Correlation Estimates
Park, J. (2000) · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America · doi:10.1785/0119990122 · Cited by 294
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Levin, V., & Park, J.
- Venue
- Geophysical Journal International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 253-266
- ISSN
- 0956-540X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-246X
- OpenAlex
- W2139402585
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: P-SH conversions in a flat-layered medium with anisotropy of arbitrary orientation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1997.tb01220.x
- The paper
- Levin, V., & Park, J. (1997). P-SH conversions in a flat-layered medium with anisotropy of arbitrary orientation. Geophysical Journal International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1997.tb01220.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.