Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 362

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Terrestrial higher‐plant response to increasing atmospheric [CO2] in relation to the global carbon cycle

AMTHOR, JEFFREY S.·1995·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Terrestrial higher plants exchange large amounts of CO 2 with the atmosphere each year; c. 15% of the atmospheric pool of C is assimilated in terrestrial‐plant photosynthesis each year, with an about equal amount returned to the atmosphere as CO 2 in plant respiration and the decomposition of soil organic matter and plant litter. Any global change in plant C metabolism can potentially affect atmospheric CO 2 content during the course of years to decades. In particular, plant responses to the presently increasing atmospheric CO 2 concentration might influence the rate of atmospheric CO 2 increase through various biotic feedbacks. Climatic changes caused by increasing atmospheric CO 2 concentration may modulate plant and ecosystem responses to CO 2 concentration. Climatic changes and increases in pollution associated with increasing atmospheric CO 2 concentration may be as significant to plant and ecosystem C balance as CO 2 concentration itself. Moreover, human activities such as deforestation and livestock grazing can have impacts on the C balance and structure of individual terrestrial ecosystems that far outweigh effects of increasing CO 2 concentration and climatic change. In short‐term experiments, which in this case means on the order of 10 years or less, elevated atmospheric CO 2 concentration affects terrestrial higher plants in several ways. Elevated CO 2 can stimulate photosynthesis, but plants may acclimate and (or) adapt to a change in atmospheric CO 2 concentration. Acclimation and adaptation of photosynthesis to increasing CO 2 concentration is unlikely to be complete, however. Plant water use efficiency is positively related to CO 2 concentration, implying the potential for more plant growth per unit of precipitation or soil moisture with increasing atmospheric CO 2 concentration. Plant respiration may be inhibited by elevated CO 2 concentration, and although a naive C balance perspective would count this as a benefit to a plant, because respiration is essential for plant growth and health, an inhibition of respiration can be detrimental. The net effect on terrestrial plants of elevated atmospheric CO 2 concentration is generally an increase in growth and C accumulation in phytomass. Published estimations, and speculations about, the magnitude of global terrestrial‐plant growth responses to increasing atmospheric CO 2 concentration range from negligible to fantastic. Well‐reasoned analyses point to moderate global plant responses to CO 2 concentration. Transfer of C from plants to soils is likely to increase with elevated CO 2 concentrations because of greater plant growth, but quantitative effects of those increased inputs to soils on soil C pool sizes are unknown. Whether increases in leaf‐level photosynthesis and short‐term plant growth stimulations caused by elevated atmospheric CO 2 concentration will have, by themselves, significant long‐term (tens to hundreds of years) effects on ecosystem C storage and atmospheric CO 2 concentration is a matter for speculation, not firm conclusion. Long‐term field studies of plant responses to elevated atmospheric CO 2 are needed. These will be expensive, difficult, and by definition, results will not be forthcoming for at least decades. Analyses of plants and ecosystems surrounding natural geological CO 2 degassing vents may provide the best surrogates for long‐term controlled experiments, and therefore the most relevant information pertaining to long‐term terrestrial‐plant responses to elevated CO 2 concentration, but pollutants associated with the vents are a concern in some cases, and quantitative knowledge of the history of atmospheric CO 2 concentrations near vents is limited. On the whole, terrestrial higher‐plant responses to increasing atmospheric CO 2 concentration probably act as negative feedbacks on atmospheric CO 2 concentration increases, but they cannot by themselves stop the fossil‐fuel‐oxidation‐driven increase in atmospheric CO 2 concentration. And, in the very long‐term, atmospheric CO 2 concentration is controlled by atmosphere‐ocean C equilibrium rather than by terrestrial plant and ecosystem responses to atmospheric CO 2 concentration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.1995.tb00025.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 362

Metadata

Authors
AMTHOR, J. S.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-08
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
243-274
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2100362601
Cited by
362
References
4
FWCI
22.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Terrestrial higher‐plant response to increasing atmospheric [CO2] in relation to the global carbon cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.1995.tb00025.x
The paper
AMTHOR, J. S. (1995). Terrestrial higher‐plant response to increasing atmospheric [CO2] in relation to the global carbon cycle. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.1995.tb00025.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.