The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurements of carbon sequestration by long‐term eddy covariance: methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy
Open accessAbstract
The turbulent exchanges of CO 2 and water vapour between an aggrading deciduous forest in the north‐eastern United States (Harvard Forest) and the atmosphere were measured from 1990 to 1994 using the eddy covariance technique. We present a detailed description of the methods used and a rigorous evaluation of the precision and accuracy of these measurements. We partition the sources of error into three categories: (1) uniform systematic errors are constant and independent of measurement conditions (2) selective systematic errors result when the accuracy of the exchange measurement varies as a function of the physical environment, and (3) sampling uncertainty results when summing an incomplete data set to calculate long‐term exchange. Analysis of the surface energy budget indicates a uniform systematic error in the turbulent exchange measurements of ‐20 to 0%. A comparison of nocturnal eddy flux with chamber measurements indicates a selective systematic underestimation during calm (friction velocity < 0.17 m s−1) nocturnal periods. We describe an approach to correct for this error. The integrated carbon sequestration in 1994 was 2.1 t C ha−1 y−1 with a 90% confidence interval due to sampling uncertainty of ±0.3 t C ha−1 y−1 determined by Monte Carlo simulation. Sampling uncertainty may be reduced by estimating the flux as a function of the physical environment during periods when direct observations are unavailable, and by minimizing the length of intervals without flux data. These analyses lead us to place an overall uncertainty on the annual carbon sequestration in 1994 of ‐0.3 to +0.8 t C ha−1 y−1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Baldocchi, D. (2008) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt07151 · Cited by 1,123
Interpreting, measuring, and modeling soil respiration
Ryan, M. G., & Law, B. E. (2005) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-004-5167-7 · Cited by 722
Falge, E., Baldocchi, D., Tenhunen, J., Aubinet, M., Bakwin, P., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., Burba, G., Clement, R., Davis, K. J., et al. (2002) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1923(02)00102-8 · Cited by 710
Self-citationStratified Atmospheric Boundary Layers
Mahrt, L. (1999) · Boundary-Layer Meteorology · doi:10.1023/a:1001765727956 · Cited by 652
REICHSTEIN, M., CIAIS, P., PAPALE, D., VALENTINI, R., RUNNING, S., VIOVY, N., CRAMER, W., GRANIER, A., OGÉE, J., ALLARD, V., et al. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01224.x · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- GOULDEN, M. L., MUNGER, J. W., FAN, S., DAUBE, B. C., & WOFSY, S. C.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 169-182
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2149541905
- Cited by
- 1,409
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurements of carbon sequestration by long‐term eddy covariance: methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.1996.tb00070.x
- The paper
- GOULDEN, M. L., MUNGER, J. W., FAN, S., DAUBE, B. C., & WOFSY, S. C. (1996). Measurements of carbon sequestration by long‐term eddy covariance: methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.1996.tb00070.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.