Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,409

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Measurements of carbon sequestration by long‐term eddy covariance: methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy

Open access
GOULDEN, MICHAEL L., MUNGER, J. WILLIAM, FAN, SONG‐MIAO, DAUBE, BRUCE C., WOFSY, STEVEN C.·1996·Global Change Biology

Abstract

The turbulent exchanges of CO 2 and water vapour between an aggrading deciduous forest in the north‐eastern United States (Harvard Forest) and the atmosphere were measured from 1990 to 1994 using the eddy covariance technique. We present a detailed description of the methods used and a rigorous evaluation of the precision and accuracy of these measurements. We partition the sources of error into three categories: (1) uniform systematic errors are constant and independent of measurement conditions (2) selective systematic errors result when the accuracy of the exchange measurement varies as a function of the physical environment, and (3) sampling uncertainty results when summing an incomplete data set to calculate long‐term exchange. Analysis of the surface energy budget indicates a uniform systematic error in the turbulent exchange measurements of ‐20 to 0%. A comparison of nocturnal eddy flux with chamber measurements indicates a selective systematic underestimation during calm (friction velocity < 0.17 m s−1) nocturnal periods. We describe an approach to correct for this error. The integrated carbon sequestration in 1994 was 2.1 t C ha−1 y−1 with a 90% confidence interval due to sampling uncertainty of ±0.3 t C ha−1 y−1 determined by Monte Carlo simulation. Sampling uncertainty may be reduced by estimating the flux as a function of the physical environment during periods when direct observations are unavailable, and by minimizing the length of intervals without flux data. These analyses lead us to place an overall uncertainty on the annual carbon sequestration in 1994 of ‐0.3 to +0.8 t C ha−1 y−1.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.1996.tb00070.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,409

Metadata

Authors
GOULDEN, M. L., MUNGER, J. W., FAN, S., DAUBE, B. C., & WOFSY, S. C.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-06
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
169-182
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2149541905
Cited by
1,409
References
0
FWCI
33.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurements of carbon sequestration by long‐term eddy covariance: methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.1996.tb00070.x
The paper
GOULDEN, M. L., MUNGER, J. W., FAN, S., DAUBE, B. C., & WOFSY, S. C. (1996). Measurements of carbon sequestration by long‐term eddy covariance: methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.1996.tb00070.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.