The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global climate change and soil carbon stocks; predictions from two contrasting models for the turnover of organic carbon in soil
Abstract
Enhanced release of CO 2 to the atmosphere from soil organic carbon as a result of increased temperatures may lead to a positive feedback between climate change and the carbon cycle, resulting in much higher CO 2 levels and accelerated global warming. However, the magnitude of this effect is uncertain and critically dependent on how the decomposition of soil organic C (heterotrophic respiration) responds to changes in climate. Previous studies with the Hadley Centre's coupled climate–carbon cycle general circulation model (GCM) (HadCM3LC) used a simple, single‐pool soil carbon model to simulate the response. Here we present results from numerical simulations that use the more sophisticated ‘RothC’ multipool soil carbon model, driven with the same climate data. The results show strong similarities in the behaviour of the two models, although RothC tends to simulate slightly smaller changes in global soil carbon stocks for the same forcing. RothC simulates global soil carbon stocks decreasing by 54 Gt C by 2100 in a climate change simulation compared with an 80 Gt C decrease in HadCM3LC. The multipool carbon dynamics of RothC cause it to exhibit a slower magnitude of transient response to both increased organic carbon inputs and changes in climate. We conclude that the projection of a positive feedback between climate and carbon cycle is robust, but the magnitude of the feedback is dependent on the structure of the soil carbon model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Griggs, D. J., & Noguer, M. (2002) · Weather · doi:10.1256/004316502320517344 · Cited by 5,754
Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model
Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Spall, S. A., & Totterdell, I. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35041539 · Cited by 4,112
Self-citationOn the Temperature Dependence of Soil Respiration
Lloyd, J., & Taylor, J. A. (1994) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.2307/2389824 · Cited by 4,038
The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate
RAICH, J. W., & SCHLESINGER, W. H. (1992) · Tellus B · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0889.1992.t01-1-00001.x · Cited by 3,486
Gordon, C., Cooper, C., Senior, C. A., Banks, H., Gregory, J. M., Johns, T. C., Mitchell, J. F. B., & Wood, R. A. (2000) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s003820050010 · Cited by 2,578
Kirschbaum, M. U. F. (1995) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(94)00242-s · Cited by 2,036
Soil Warming and Carbon-Cycle Feedbacks to the Climate System
Melillo, J. M., Steudler, P. A., Aber, J. D., Newkirk, K., Lux, H., Bowles, F. P., Catricala, C., Magill, A., Ahrens, T., & Morrisseau, S. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1074153 · Cited by 1,380
Global patterns of carbon dioxide emissions from soils
Raich, J. W., & Potter, C. S. (1995) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/94gb02723 · Cited by 1,134
The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
Prentice, I. C., Farquhar, G. D., Fasham, M. J. R., GOULDEN, M. L., Heimann, M., Jaramillo, V. J., Kheshgi, H. S., Quéré, C. L., Scholes, R. J., Wallace, D. W. R., et al. (2001) · HAL · Cited by 1,127
Self-citationAGE OF SOIL ORGANIC MATTER AND SOIL RESPIRATION: RADIOCARBON CONSTRAINTS ON BELOWGROUND C DYNAMICS
Trumbore, S. (2000) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0399:aosoma]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,119
Cited by
Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change
Davidson, E. A., & Janssens, I. A. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04514 · Cited by 6,919
Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis: Results from the C4MIP Model Intercomparison
Friedlingstein, P., Cox, P., Betts, R., Bopp, L., von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P., Doney, S., Eby, M., Fung, I., et al. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3800.1 · Cited by 2,902
Self-citationSoil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions
Burns, R. G., DeForest, J. L., Marxsen, J., Sinsabaugh, R. L., Stromberger, M. E., Wallenstein, M. D., Weintraub, M. N., & Zoppini, A. (2013) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.009 · Cited by 2,552
Development and evaluation of an Earth-System model – HadGEM2
Collins, W. J., Bellouin, N., Doutriaux-Boucher, M., Gedney, N., Halloran, P., Hinton, T., Hughes, J., Jones, C. D., Joshi, M., Liddicoat, S., et al. (2011) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-4-1051-2011 · Cited by 1,516
Self-citationThe HadGEM2 family of Met Office Unified Model climate configurations
The HadGEM2 Development Team: G. M. Martin, Bellouin, N., Collins, W. J., Culverwell, I. D., Halloran, P. R., Hardiman, S. C., Hinton, T. J., Jones, C. D., McDonald, R. E., McLaren, A. J., et al. (2011) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-4-723-2011 · Cited by 934
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, C., McConnell, C., Coleman, K., Cox, P., Falloon, P., Jenkinson, D., & Powlson, D.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-12-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 154-166
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2132411008
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 21.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global climate change and soil carbon stocks; predictions from two contrasting models for the turnover of organic carbon in soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00885.x
- The paper
- Jones, C., McConnell, C., Coleman, K., Cox, P., Falloon, P., Jenkinson, D., & Powlson, D. (2005). Global climate change and soil carbon stocks; predictions from two contrasting models for the turnover of organic carbon in soil. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00885.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
