The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Root respiration in temperate mountain grasslands differing in land use
Abstract
In grasslands the proportionally largest emission of CO 2 comes from the soil. This study aimed to assess how root respiration, a major flux component, is affected by land management and changes in land use. Respiration of roots, separated to classes of different diameter, was measured in 11 temperate mountain grasslands, including meadows, pastures and abandoned sites at three geographic locations. Specific root respiration was affected by nitrogen (N) concentration, root class and land use. The relationship between root N concentration and respiration differed between locations. With increasing root diameter there was a decrease in root respiration, N concentration, respiration per unit N and Q10. In grasslands abandoned for several years specific root respiration was lower than in meadows, pastures and a recently abandoned site. This was due to lower root N concentrations and/or lower respiration rates per unit N within each root class. Since root biomass was higher on abandoned grasslands, total ecosystem root respiration did not differ consistently between sites. Ecosystem root respiration showed distinct seasonal changes due to changes in root biomass, which were less pronounced on abandoned grasslands. Fine roots generally made up the largest portion of ecosystem root respiration, their contribution varying between 35% and 96%. On meadows, clipping increased soil and root respiration by increasing soil temperature. When corrected for temperature effects soil respiration was reduced by 20–50%, whilst root respiration was little affected, suggesting that carbohydrate reserves sustained root metabolism for several days and that microbial respiration strongly responded to short‐term changes in assimilate supply.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carbon input to soil may decrease soil carbon content.
Fontaine, S., Bardoux, G., Abbadie, L., & Mariotti, A. (2004) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00579.x · Cited by 814
Cited by
KUZYAKOV, Y., & GAVRICHKOVA, O. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02179.x · Cited by 687
Schaufler, G., Kitzler, B., Schindlbacher, A., Skiba, U., Sutton, M. A., & Zechmeister‐Boltenstern, S. (2010) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01277.x · Cited by 472
Canarini, A., Schmidt, H., Fuchslueger, L., Martin, V., Herbold, C. W., Zezula, D., Gündler, P., Hasibeder, R., Jecmenica, M., Bahn, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25675-4 · Cited by 384
Self-citationFuchslueger, L., Bahn, M., Fritz, K., Hasibeder, R., & Richter, A. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12569 · Cited by 369
Self-citationGlobal-scale latitudinal patterns of plant fine-root nitrogen and phosphorus
Yuan, Z. Y., Chen, H. Y. H., & Reich, P. B. (2011) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1346 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- BAHN, M., KNAPP, M., GARAJOVA, Z., PFAHRINGER, N., & CERNUSCA, A.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 995-1006
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2147856768
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Root respiration in temperate mountain grasslands differing in land use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01144.x
- The paper
- BAHN, M., KNAPP, M., GARAJOVA, Z., PFAHRINGER, N., & CERNUSCA, A. (2006). Root respiration in temperate mountain grasslands differing in land use. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01144.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.