Cited by 44Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPlant responses to elevated CO2CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions

Estimating soil carbon sequestration under elevated CO2 by combining carbon isotope labelling with soil carbon cycle modelling

NIKLAUS, PASCAL A., FALLOON, PETE·2006·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Elevated CO 2 concentrations generally stimulate grassland productivity, but herbaceous plants have only a limited capacity to sequester extra carbon (C) in biomass. However, increased primary productivity under elevated CO 2 could result in increased transfer of C into soils where it could be stored for prolonged periods and exercise a negative feedback on the rise in atmospheric CO 2. Measuring soil C sequestration directly is notoriously difficult for a number of methodological reasons. Here, we present a method that combines C isotope labelling with soil C cycle modelling to partition net soil sequestration into changes in new C fixed over the experimental duration (C new) and pre‐experimental C (C old). This partitioning is advantageous because the C new accumulates whereas C old is lost in the course of time (ΔC new>0 whereas ΔC old<0). We applied this method to calcareous grassland exposed to 600 μL CO 2 L−1 for 6 years. The CO 2 used for atmospheric enrichment was depleted in 13 C relative to the background atmosphere, and this distinct isotopic signature was used to quantify net soil C new fluxes under elevated CO 2. Using 13 C/12 C mass balance and inverse modelling, the Rothamsted model ‘RothC’ predicted gross soil C new inputs under elevated CO 2 and the decomposition of C old. The modelled soil C pools and fluxes were in good agreement with experimental data. C isotope data indicated a net sequestration of ≈90 g C new m−2 yr−1 in elevated CO 2. Accounting for C old‐losses, this figure was reduced to ≈30 g C m−2 yr−1 at elevated CO 2; the elevated CO 2‐effect on net C sequestration was in the range of≈10 g C m−2 yr−1. A sensitivity and error analysis suggests that the modelled data are relatively robust. However, elevated CO 2‐specific mechanisms may necessitate a separate parameterization at ambient and elevated CO 2; these include increased soil moisture due to reduced leaf conductance, soil disaggregation as a consequence of increased soil moisture, and priming effects. These effects could accelerate decomposition of C old in elevated CO 2 so that the CO 2 enrichment effect may be zero or even negative. Overall, our findings suggest that the C sequestration potential of this grassland under elevated CO 2 is rather limited.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01215.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integrated studies on carbon enrichment such as POPFACE have shown that increased atmospheric CO2 can induce a decrease of soil organic carbon attributed to a priming effect.

    “Integrated studies on C enrichment, e.g. POPFACE, have shown that increased atmospheric CO2 can induce a decrease of SOC [78] attributed to a priming effect [99, 102, 129, 130].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 44

Authors
NIKLAUS, P. A., & FALLOON, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Met Office (GB)
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-08-21
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
1909-1921
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2043602343
Cited by
44
References
83
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Savitribai Phule Pune University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant responses to elevated CO2
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Keywords
soil carbon sequestration, elevated CO2, carbon isotope labeling, RothC model, calcareous grasslands, carbon decomposition, carbon flux partitioning, inverse modeling, soil moisture, priming effect, soil aggregation, leaf conductance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review