Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Large‐scale climatic signatures in lakes across Europe: a meta‐analysis

Open access
BLENCKNER, THORSTEN, ADRIAN, RITA, LIVINGSTONE, DAVID M., JENNINGS, ELEANOR, WEYHENMEYER, GESA A., GEORGE, D. GLEN, JANKOWSKI, THOMAS, JÄRVINEN, MARKO, AONGHUSA, CAITRIONA NIC, NÕGES, TIINA, STRAILE, DIETMAR, TEUBNER, KATRIN·2007·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Recent studies have highlighted the impact of the winter North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) on water temperature, ice conditions, and spring plankton phenology in specific lakes and regions in Europe. Here, we use meta‐analysis techniques to test whether 18 lakes in northern, western, and central Europe respond coherently to winter climate forcing, and to assess the persistence of the winter climate signal in physical, chemical, and biological variables during the year. A meta‐analysis approach was chosen because we wished to emphasize the overall coherence pattern rather than individual lake responses. A particular strength of our approach is that time‐series from each of the 18 lakes were subjected to the same robust statistical analysis covering the same 23‐year period. Although the strongest overall coherence in response to the winter NAO was exhibited by lake water temperatures, a strong, coherent response was also exhibited by concentrations of soluble reactive phosphorus and soluble reactive silicate, most likely as a result of the coherent response exhibited by the spring phytoplankton bloom. Lake nitrate concentrations showed significant coherence in winter. With the exception of the cyanobacterial biomass in summer, phytoplankton biomass in all seasons was unrelated to the winter NAO. A strong coherence in the abundance of daphnids during spring can most likely be attributed to coherence in daphnid phenology. A strong coherence in the summer abundance of the cyclopoid copepods may have been related to a coherent change in their emergence from resting stages. We discuss the complex nature of the potential mechanisms that drive the observed changes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01364.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
BLENCKNER, T., ADRIAN, R., LIVINGSTONE, D. M., JENNINGS, E., WEYHENMEYER, G. A., GEORGE, D. G., JANKOWSKI, T., JÄRVINEN, M., AONGHUSA, C. N., NÕGES, T., STRAILE, D., & TEUBNER, K.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04-17
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
1314-1326
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2143130009
Cited by
247
References
1
FWCI
15.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large‐scale climatic signatures in lakes across Europe: a meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01364.x
The paper
BLENCKNER, T., ADRIAN, R., LIVINGSTONE, D. M., JENNINGS, E., WEYHENMEYER, G. A., GEORGE, D. G., JANKOWSKI, T., JÄRVINEN, M., AONGHUSA, C. N., NÕGES, T., STRAILE, D., & TEUBNER, K. (2007). Large‐scale climatic signatures in lakes across Europe: a meta‐analysis. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01364.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.