The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thirty‐five years of synchrony in the organic matter concentrations of Swedish rivers explained by variation in flow and sulphate
Abstract
Increasing concentrations of organic matter (OM) in surface waters have been noted over large parts of the boreal/nemoral zone in Europe and North America. This has raised questions about the causes and the likelihood of further increases. A number of drivers have been proposed, including temperature, hydrology, as well as ‐ and Cl− deposition. The data reported so far, however, have been insufficient to define the relative importance of different drivers in landscapes where they interact. Thirty‐five years of monthly measurements of absorbance and chemical oxygen demand (COD), two common proxies for OM, from 28 large Scandinavian catchments provide an unprecedented opportunity to resolve the importance of hypothesized drivers. For 21 of the catchments, there are 18 years of total organic carbon (TOC) measurements as well. Despite the heterogeneity of the catchments with regards to climate, size and land use, there is a high degree of synchronicity in OM across the entire region. Rivers go from widespread trends of decreasing OM to increasing trends and back again three times in the 35‐year record. This synchronicity in decadal scale oscillations and long‐term trends suggest a common set of dominant OM drivers in these landscapes. Here, we use regression models to test the importance of different potential drivers. We show that flow and together can predict most of the interannual variability in OM proxies, up to 88% for absorbance, up to 78% for COD. Two other candidate drivers, air temperature and Cl−, add little explanatory value. Declines in anthropogenic since the mid‐1970s are thus related to the observed OM increases in Scandinavia, but, in contrast to many recent studies, flow emerges as an even more important driver of OM variability. Stabilizing levels also mean that hydrology is likely to be the major driver of future variability and trends in OM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McKnight, D. M., Bencala, K. E., Zellweger, G. W., Aiken, G. R., Feder, G. L., & Thorn, K. A. (1992) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es00031a017 · Cited by 405
Cited by
Creed, I. F., Bergström, A., Trick, C. G., Grimm, N. B., Hessen, D. O., Karlsson, J., Kidd, K. A., Kritzberg, E., McKnight, D. M., Freeman, E. C., et al. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14129 · Cited by 382
Self-citationLapierre, J.-F., Guillemette, F., Berggren, M., & del Giorgio, P. A. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3972 · Cited by 334
Orlova, J., Amiri, F., Bourgeois, A. K., Buttle, J. M., Cherlet, E., Cuss, C. W., Devito, K. J., Emelko, M. B., Floyd, W. C., Foster, D. E., et al. (2024) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2023wr035196 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- ERLANDSSON, M., BUFFAM, I., FÖLSTER, J., LAUDON, H., TEMNERUD, J., WEYHENMEYER, G. A., & BISHOP, K.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01-20
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1191-1198
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W1999012021
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thirty‐five years of synchrony in the organic matter concentrations of Swedish rivers explained by variation in flow and sulphate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01551.x
- The paper
- ERLANDSSON, M., BUFFAM, I., FÖLSTER, J., LAUDON, H., TEMNERUD, J., WEYHENMEYER, G. A., & BISHOP, K. (2008). Thirty‐five years of synchrony in the organic matter concentrations of Swedish rivers explained by variation in flow and sulphate. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01551.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.