Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 461

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carbon dynamics in topsoil and in subsoil may be controlled by different regulatory mechanisms

SALOMÉ, CLÉMENCE, NUNAN, NAOISE, POUTEAU, VALÉRIE, LERCH, THOMAS Z., CHENU, CLAIRE·2010·Global Change Biology

Abstract

It is estimated that in excess of 50% of the soil carbon stock is found in the subsoil (below 20–30 cm). Despite this very few studies have paid attention to the subsoil. Although surface and subsurface horizons differ in pedological, environmental and physicochemical features, which are all likely to affect the mechanisms and biological actors involved, models of carbon dynamics tend to assume that the underlying processes are identical in all horizons, but with lower gross fluxes in the subsurface. The aim of this study was to test this assumption by analysing factors governing organic matter decomposition in topsoil (from depths of 5–10 cm) and subsoil (from depths of 80–100 cm). To this end, we established incubations that lasted 51 days, in which factors that were thought to control organic matter mineralization were altered: oxygen concentration, soil structure and the energetic and nutritional status. At the end of the incubation period, the microbial biomass was measured and the community level physiological profiles established. The mineralization per unit organic carbon proved to be as important in the subsoil as it was in surface samples, in spite of lower carbon contents and different catabolic profiles. Differences in the treatment effects indicated that the controls on C dynamics were different in topsoil and subsoil: disrupting the structure of the subsoil caused a 75% increase in mineralization while the surface samples remained unaffected. On the other hand, a significant priming affect was found in the topsoil but not in the subsoil samples. Spatial heterogeneity in carbon content, respiration and microbial communities was greater in subsoil than in topsoil at the field scale. These data suggest greater attention should be paid to the subsoil if global C dynamics is to be fully understood.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01884.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 461

Metadata

Authors
SALOMÉ, C., NUNAN, N., POUTEAU, V., LERCH, T. Z., & CHENU, C.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
416-426
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2121124271
Cited by
461
References
2
FWCI
20.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon dynamics in topsoil and in subsoil may be controlled by different regulatory mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01884.x
The paper
SALOMÉ, C., NUNAN, N., POUTEAU, V., LERCH, T. Z., & CHENU, C. (2010). Carbon dynamics in topsoil and in subsoil may be controlled by different regulatory mechanisms. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01884.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.