The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A climatic basis for microrefugia: the influence of terrain on climate
Abstract
There is compelling evidence from glacial and interglacial periods of the Quaternary of the utilization of microrefugia. Microrefugia are sites that support locally favorable climates amidst unfavorable regional climates, which allow populations of species to persist outside of their main distributions. Knowledge of the location of microrefugia has important implications for climate change research as it will influence our understanding of the spatial distribution of species through time, their patterns of genetic diversity, and potential dispersal rates in response to climate shifts. Indeed, the implications of microrefugia are profound and yet we know surprisingly little about their climatic basis; what climatic processes can support their subsistence, where they may occur, their climatic traits, and the relevance of these locations for climate change research. Here I examine the climatic basis for microrefugia and assert that the interaction between regional advective influences and local terrain influences will define the distribution and nature of microrefugia. I review the climatic processes that can support their subsistence and from this climatic basis: (1) infer traits of the spatial distribution of microrefugia and how this may change through time; (2) review assertions about their landscape position and what it can tell us about regional climates; and (3) demonstrate an approach to forecasting where microrefugia may occur in the future. This synthesis highlights the importance of landscape physiography in shaping the adaptive response of biota to climate change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vegetation and environment in Eastern North America during the Last Glacial Maximum
Jackson, S. T., Webb, R. S., Anderson, K. H., Overpeck, J. T., Webb III, T., Williams, J. W., & Hansen, B. C. S. (2000) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0277-3791(99)00093-1 · Cited by 335
Cited by
Global buffering of temperatures under forest canopies
De Frenne, P., Zellweger, F., Rodríguez-Sánchez, F., Scheffers, B. R., Hylander, K., Luoto, M., Vellend, M., Verheyen, K., & Lenoir, J. (2019) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-019-0842-1 · Cited by 787
Spatial models reveal the microclimatic buffering capacity of old-growth forests
Frey, S. J. K., Hadley, A. S., Johnson, S. L., Schulze, M., Jones, J. A., & Betts, M. G. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501392 · Cited by 369
Climate‐change refugia: biodiversity in the slow lane
Morelli, T. L., Barrows, C. W., Ramirez, A. R., Cartwright, J. M., Ackerly, D. D., Eaves, T. D., Ebersole, J. L., Krawchuk, M. A., Letcher, B. H., Mahalovich, M. F., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.2189 · Cited by 341
Jucker, T., Hardwick, S. R., Both, S., Elias, D. M. O., Ewers, R. M., Milodowski, D. T., Swinfield, T., & Coomes, D. A. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14415 · Cited by 281
Why geodiversity matters in valuing nature's stage
Hjort, J., Gordon, J. E., Gray, M., & Hunter, M. L. (2015) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12510 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- DOBROWSKI, S. Z.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1022-1035
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2156841287
- Cited by
- 1,035
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A climatic basis for microrefugia: the influence of terrain on climate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02263.x
- The paper
- DOBROWSKI, S. Z. (2011). A climatic basis for microrefugia: the influence of terrain on climate. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02263.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.