Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Water‐use efficiency in response to climate change: from leaf to ecosystem in a temperate steppe

NIU, SHULI, XING, XUERONG, ZHANG, ZHE, XIA, JIANYANG, ZHOU, XUHUI, SONG, BING, LI, LINGHAO, WAN, SHIQIANG·2011·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Water‐use efficiency (WUE) has been recognized as an important characteristic of ecosystem productivity, which links carbon (C) and water cycling. However, little is known about how WUE responds to climate change at different scales. Here, we investigated WUE at leaf, canopy, and ecosystem levels under increased precipitation and warming from 2005 to 2008 in a temperate steppe in Northern China. We measured gross ecosystem productivity (GEP), net ecosystem CO 2 exchange (NEE), evapotranspiration (ET), evaporation (E), canopy transpiration (Tc), as well as leaf photosynthesis (Pmax) and transpiration (Tl) of a dominant species to calculate canopy WUE (WUE c=GEP/T), ecosystem WUE (WUE gep=GEP/ET or WUE nee=NEE/ET) and leaf WUE (WUE l=Pmax/Tl). The results showed that increased precipitation stimulated WUE c, WUE gep and WUE nee by 17.1%, 10.2% and 12.6%, respectively, but decreased WUE l by 27.4%. Climate warming reduced canopy and ecosystem WUE over the 4 years but did not affect leaf level WUE. Across the 4 years and the measured plots, canopy and ecosystem WUE linearly increased, but leaf level WUE of the dominant species linearly decreased with increasing precipitation. The differential responses of canopy/ecosystem WUE and leaf WUE to climate change suggest that caution should be taken when upscaling WUE from leaf to larger scales. Our findings will also facilitate mechanistic understanding of the C–water relationships across different organism levels and in projecting the effects of climate warming and shifting precipitation regimes on productivity in arid and semiarid ecosystems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02280.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 396

Metadata

Authors
NIU, S., XING, X., ZHANG, Z., XIA, J., ZHOU, X., SONG, B., LI, L., & WAN, S.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
1073-1082
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W1553414882
Cited by
396
References
0
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Water‐use efficiency in response to climate change: from leaf to ecosystem in a temperate steppe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02280.x
The paper
NIU, S., XING, X., ZHANG, Z., XIA, J., ZHOU, X., SONG, B., LI, L., & WAN, S. (2011). Water‐use efficiency in response to climate change: from leaf to ecosystem in a temperate steppe. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02280.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.