The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nitrogen deposition and forest nitrogen cycling along an urban–rural transect in southern China
Abstract
There is increasing concern over the impact of atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition on forest ecosystems in the tropical and subtropical areas. In this study, we quantified atmospheric N deposition and revealed current plant and soil N status in 14 forests along a 150 km urban to rural transect in southern China, with an emphasis on examining whether foliar δ15 N can be used as an indicator of N saturation. Bulk deposition ranged from 16.2 to 38.2 kg N ha−1 yr−1, while the throughfall covered a larger range of 11.7–65.1 kg N ha−1 yr−1. Foliar N concentration, NO 3− leaching to stream, and soil NO 3− concentration were low and NO 3− production was negligible in some rural forests, indicating that primary production in these forests may be limited by N supply. But all these N variables were enhanced in suburban and urban forests. Across the study transect, throughfall N input was correlated positively with soil nitrification and NO 3− leaching to stream, and negatively with pH values in soil and stream water. Foliar δ15 N was between −6.6‰ and 0.7‰, and was negatively correlated with soil NO 3− concentration and NO 3− leaching to stream across the entire transect, demonstrating that an increased N supply does not necessarily increase forest δ15 N values. We proposed several potential mechanism that could contribute to the δ15 N pattern, including (1) increased plant uptake of 15 N‐depleted soil NO 3−, (2) foliage uptake of 15 N‐depleted NH 4+, (3) increased utilization of soil inorganic N relative to dissolved organic N, and (4) increased fractionation during plant N uptake under higher soil N availability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and future
Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., Boyer, E. W., Howarth, R. W., Seitzinger, S. P., Asner, G. P., Cleveland, C. C., Green, P. A., Holland, E. A., et al. (2004) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0 · Cited by 5,315
Nitrogen mineralization: Challenges of a changing paradigm
Schimel, J. P., & Bennett, J. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-8002 · Cited by 2,511
Cited by
Nitrogen deposition and its ecological impact in China: An overview
Liu, X., Duan, L., Mo, J., Du, E., Shen, J., Lu, X., Zhang, Y., Zhou, X., He, C., & Zhang, F. (2011) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2010.08.002 · Cited by 772
Self-citationEcology of Nitrogen Fixing, Nitrifying, and Denitrifying Microorganisms in Tropical Forest Soils
Pajares, S., & Bohannan, B. J. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01045 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- FANG, Y., YOH, M., KOBA, K., ZHU, W., TAKEBAYASHI, Y., XIAO, Y., LEI, C., MO, J., ZHANG, W., & LU, X.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 872-885
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W1936524164
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrogen deposition and forest nitrogen cycling along an urban–rural transect in southern China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02283.x
- The paper
- FANG, Y., YOH, M., KOBA, K., ZHU, W., TAKEBAYASHI, Y., XIAO, Y., LEI, C., MO, J., ZHANG, W., & LU, X. (2011). Nitrogen deposition and forest nitrogen cycling along an urban–rural transect in southern China. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02283.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.