Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nitrogen deposition and forest nitrogen cycling along an urban–rural transect in southern China

FANG, YUNTING, YOH, MUNEOKI, KOBA, KEISUKE, ZHU, WEIXING, TAKEBAYASHI, YU, XIAO, YIHUA, LEI, CHUNYI, MO, JIANGMING, ZHANG, WEI, LU, XIANKAI·2011·Global Change Biology

Abstract

There is increasing concern over the impact of atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition on forest ecosystems in the tropical and subtropical areas. In this study, we quantified atmospheric N deposition and revealed current plant and soil N status in 14 forests along a 150 km urban to rural transect in southern China, with an emphasis on examining whether foliar δ15 N can be used as an indicator of N saturation. Bulk deposition ranged from 16.2 to 38.2 kg N ha−1 yr−1, while the throughfall covered a larger range of 11.7–65.1 kg N ha−1 yr−1. Foliar N concentration, NO 3− leaching to stream, and soil NO 3− concentration were low and NO 3− production was negligible in some rural forests, indicating that primary production in these forests may be limited by N supply. But all these N variables were enhanced in suburban and urban forests. Across the study transect, throughfall N input was correlated positively with soil nitrification and NO 3− leaching to stream, and negatively with pH values in soil and stream water. Foliar δ15 N was between −6.6‰ and 0.7‰, and was negatively correlated with soil NO 3− concentration and NO 3− leaching to stream across the entire transect, demonstrating that an increased N supply does not necessarily increase forest δ15 N values. We proposed several potential mechanism that could contribute to the δ15 N pattern, including (1) increased plant uptake of 15 N‐depleted soil NO 3−, (2) foliage uptake of 15 N‐depleted NH 4+, (3) increased utilization of soil inorganic N relative to dissolved organic N, and (4) increased fractionation during plant N uptake under higher soil N availability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02283.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
FANG, Y., YOH, M., KOBA, K., ZHU, W., TAKEBAYASHI, Y., XIAO, Y., LEI, C., MO, J., ZHANG, W., & LU, X.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
872-885
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W1936524164
Cited by
223
References
2
FWCI
15.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrogen deposition and forest nitrogen cycling along an urban–rural transect in southern China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02283.x
The paper
FANG, Y., YOH, M., KOBA, K., ZHU, W., TAKEBAYASHI, Y., XIAO, Y., LEI, C., MO, J., ZHANG, W., & LU, X. (2011). Nitrogen deposition and forest nitrogen cycling along an urban–rural transect in southern China. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02283.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.