The dynamics of soil redistribution and the implications for soil organic carbon accounting in agricultural south‐eastern A ustralia
Abstract
Anthropogenically induced change in soil redistribution plays an important role in the soil organic carbon (SOC) budget. Uncertainty of its impact is large because of the dearth of recent soil redistribution estimates concomitant with changing land use and management practices. An Australian national survey used the artificial radionuclide caesium‐137 (137Cs) to estimate net (1950s–1990) soil redistribution. South‐eastern Australia showed a median net soil loss of 9.7 t ha−1 yr−1. We resurveyed the region using the same 137Cs technique and found a median net (1990–2010) soil gain of 3.9 t ha−1 yr−1 with an interquartile range from −1.6 t ha−1 yr−1 to +10.7 t ha−1 yr−1. Despite this variation, soil erosion across the region has declined as a likely consequence of the widespread adoption of soil conservation measures over the last ca 30 years. The implication of omitted soil redistribution dynamics in SOC accounting is to increase uncertainty and diminish its accuracy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Persistent groundcover resulting in decreased erosion has a two-fold SOC benefit: elimination of a direct loss pathway via eroded topsoil and maintenance of improved soil structure.
“Persistent groundcover resulting in decreased erosion will have a two-fold SOC benefit–elimination of a direct loss pathway via eroded topsoil and maintenance of improved soil structure [23].”
From Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia (2015) · cites this paper as [23]
Cites
Ritchie, J. C., & McHenry, J. R. (1990) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq1990.00472425001900020006x · Cited by 1,227 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia
Sanderman, J., Reseigh, J., Wurst, M., Young, M.-A., & Austin, J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136157 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Chappell, A., Sanderman, J., Thomas, M., Read, A., & Leslie, C.
- Affiliations
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Chappell, Adrian
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-30
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2081-2088
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2054451332
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
- Keywords
- soil redistribution, soil erosion, soil conservation, land use change, carbon budget uncertainty, south-eastern Australia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review