Cited by 54Soil erosion and sediment transportSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Geostatistics and Mapping

The dynamics of soil redistribution and the implications for soil organic carbon accounting in agricultural south‐eastern A ustralia

Chappell, Adrian, Sanderman, Jonathan, Thomas, Mark, Read, Arthur, Leslie, Chris·2012·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Anthropogenically induced change in soil redistribution plays an important role in the soil organic carbon (SOC) budget. Uncertainty of its impact is large because of the dearth of recent soil redistribution estimates concomitant with changing land use and management practices. An Australian national survey used the artificial radionuclide caesium‐137 (137Cs) to estimate net (1950s–1990) soil redistribution. South‐eastern Australia showed a median net soil loss of 9.7 t ha−1 yr−1. We resurveyed the region using the same 137Cs technique and found a median net (1990–2010) soil gain of 3.9 t ha−1 yr−1 with an interquartile range from −1.6 t ha−1 yr−1 to +10.7 t ha−1 yr−1. Despite this variation, soil erosion across the region has declined as a likely consequence of the widespread adoption of soil conservation measures over the last ca 30 years. The implication of omitted soil redistribution dynamics in SOC accounting is to increase uncertainty and diminish its accuracy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02682.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Persistent groundcover resulting in decreased erosion has a two-fold SOC benefit: elimination of a direct loss pathway via eroded topsoil and maintenance of improved soil structure.

    “Persistent groundcover resulting in decreased erosion will have a two-fold SOC benefit–elimination of a direct loss pathway via eroded topsoil and maintenance of improved soil structure [23].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chappell, A., Sanderman, J., Thomas, M., Read, A., & Leslie, C.
Affiliations
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Chappell, Adrian
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03-30
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
2081-2088
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2054451332
Cited by
54
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Keywords
soil redistribution, soil erosion, soil conservation, land use change, carbon budget uncertainty, south-eastern Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review