CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 129Technology Use by Older AdultsNursing care and researchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A pilot study of how information and communication technology may contribute to health promotion among elderly spousal carers in Norway: ICT and health among elderly spousal carers

Open access
Torp, Steffen, Hanson, Elizabeth, Hauge, Solveig, Ulstein, Ingun, Magnusson, Lennart·2007·Health & Social Care in the Community
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00725.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The objective of this pilot Norwegian intervention study was to explore whether use of information and communication technology (ICT) by informal carers of frail elderly people living at home would enable them to gain more knowledge about chronic illness, caring and coping, establish an informal support network and reduce stress and related mental health problems. Potential participants were close relatives of an elderly person with a diagnosis of a chronic illness dwelling in the same household who wished to continue caring for their relative at home, were 60 years of age or older, had been caring for less than 2 years, were a computer novice and had Norwegian as their first language. Nineteen elderly spousal carers participated in the study from two municipalities in eastern Norway. The project commenced in January 2004 and consisted of a multimethod evaluation model. Outcomes measured included carers' social contacts (measured by the Family and Friendship Contacts scale); burden of care (measured by the Relative Stress scale); and knowledge about chronic disease and caring, stress and mental health and use of ICT (examined via a composite carer questionnaire). These quantitative data were collected immediately prior to the study and at 12 months. Qualitative data were also collected via focus group interviews with participant carers at 7 months. At follow-up, quantitative measures did not reveal any reduction in carer stress or mental health problems. However, carers reported extensive use of the ICT service, more social contacts and increased support and less need for information about chronic illness and caring. Contact with and support from other carers with similar experiences was particularly valued by participants. The intervention also enhanced contacts with family and friends outside the carer network. Thus, it can be seen that ICT has the potential to contribute to health promotion among elderly spousal carers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00725.x

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Borgermans, 2001, Family Care for Older People and Their Families, 1
  2. Engedahl, 2004, Laerebok Demens
  3. EU Ministerial Declaration, 2006, 11 June, Ministerial Conference for ‘ICT for an Inclusive Society’ of the Austrian Presidency of the European Council and of the European Commission
  4. Hauge, 2003, Helsefremmende Arbeid i en Brytningstid. Fra Monolog Til Dialog?
  5. Maeland, 2005, Forebyggende Helsearbeid i Teori og Praksis
  6. Magnusson, 2002, IT-Baserat Anhörigstöd i Vård och Omsorg - Ett Projekt För at Pröva och Utvärdera Modern Informationsteknik och Videokonferens Som Stöd För Äldre och Deras Anhörigvårdare [IT-Based Support for Family Carers
  7. Ministry of Health and Care Services, 2005, Fra Stykkevis til Helt
  8. Morgan, 1998, The Focus Group Kit
  9. Nolan, 1996, Understanding Family Care
  10. Nunnally, 1994, Psychometric Theory
  11. Pawson, 1997, Realistic Evaluation
  12. Romøren, 2001, Den Fjerde Alderen
  13. Torp, 2006, IKT-basert Pårørendestøtte

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–129 of 129

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Torp, S., Hanson, E., Hauge, S., Ulstein, I., & Magnusson, L.
Affiliations
  • Vestfold University College (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
ORCID
Venue
Health & Social Care in the Community
Publisher
Hindawi Limited
Published
2007-07-27
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
75-85
ISSN
0966-0410 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00725.x
OpenAlex
W2101707596
Cited by
129
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 2958 d)
Locations
  • Health & Social Care in the Community (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
information and communication technologies, informal care, frail elderly, home care, health promotion, carer stress, mental health, informal support networks, social contact, caregiver burden
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Communication, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Technology, User-Computer Interface, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review