Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

E‐cadherin expression in invasive non‐lobular carcinoma of the breast and its prognostic significance

Rakha, E A, Abd El Rehim, D, Pinder, S E, Lewis, S A, Ellis, I O·2005·Histopathology

Abstract

Background : E‐cadherin is a cell adhesion molecule that is expressed in normal breast tissue and is often considered useful as a phenotypic marker in breast cancer diagnosis, with absence of its expression frequently observed in tumours of lobular subtype. However, the clinicopathological and prognostic value of E‐cadherin in the more frequent non‐lobular types of breast carcinoma is unclear. Methods and results : E‐cadherin expression was assessed immunohistochemically in a large and well‐characterized series of invasive non‐lobular breast carcinoma types (n = 1665) with long‐term clinical follow‐up (median 56 months) using tissue microarray technology, to determine the relationship between its expression and primary tumour characteristics and disease outcome. Only membranous expression of E‐cadherin was considered in this study and its expression was categorized as normal (H‐score > 100) or reduced [absent or below the median (score≤100)]. Complete absence of its expression (score = 0) was detected in 7.2% of cases. On univariate analysis, reduced E‐cadherin expression was associated with a reduced disease‐free interval and overall survival and also with indicators of poor prognosis including larger tumour size, higher histological grade, development of distant metastasis and tumours negative for oestrogen receptors. No association between E‐cadherin expression and lymph node status was found. On multivariate analysis, E‐cadherin was an independent predictor of disease‐free interval [hazards ratio (HR) 1.56, 95% confidence intrerval (CI) 1.23, 1.99; P < 0.001] and overall survival (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.09, 2.14; P = 0.013) and there was some evidence that the prognostic value was greater in those with positive lymph nodes (Pinteraction = 0.099). Conclusions : These results suggest that E‐cadherin loss may play a role in progression, development of distant metastasis and recurrence in non‐lobular invasive carcinomas of the breast and its assessment by immunohistochemistry may help in the identification of patients with poor outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02156.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Rakha, E. A., Abd El Rehim, D., Pinder, S. E., Lewis, S. A., & Ellis, I. O.
Venue
Histopathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-05-18
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
685-693
ISSN
  • 0309-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2559
OpenAlex
W2028057673
Cited by
171
References
1
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: E‐cadherin expression in invasive non‐lobular carcinoma of the breast and its prognostic significance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02156.x
The paper
Rakha, E. A., Abd El Rehim, D., Pinder, S. E., Lewis, S. A., & Ellis, I. O. (2005). E‐cadherin expression in invasive non‐lobular carcinoma of the breast and its prognostic significance. Histopathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02156.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.