Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 834

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Synovitis score: discrimination between chronic low‐grade and high‐grade synovitis

Krenn, V, Morawietz, L, Burmester, G‐R, Kinne, R W, Mueller‐Ladner, U, Muller, B, Haupl, T·2006·Histopathology

Abstract

Aims : To standardize the histopathological assessment of synovial membrane specimens in order to contribute to the diagnostics of rheumatic and non‐rheumatic joint diseases. Methods and results : Three features of chronic synovitis (enlargement of lining cell layer, cellular density of synovial stroma, leukocytic infiltrate) were semiquantitatively evaluated (from 0, absent to 3, strong) and each feature was graded separately. The sum provided the synovitis score, which was interpreted as follows: 0–1, no synovitis; 2–4, low‐grade synovitis; 5–9, high‐grade synovitis. Five hundred and fifty‐nine synovectomy specimens were graded by two independent observers. Clinical diagnoses were osteoarthrosis (n = 212), post‐traumatic arthritis (n = 21), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 246), psoriatic arthritis (n = 22), reactive arthritis (n = 9), as well as controls (n = 49) from autopsies of patients without joint damage. Median synovitis scores when correlated with clinical diagnoses were: controls 1.0, osteoarthritis 2.0, post‐traumatic arthritis 2.0, psoriatic arthritis 3.5, reactive arthritis 5.0 and rheumatoid arthritis 5.0. The scores differed significantly between most disease groups, especially between degenerative and rheumatic diseases. A high‐grade synovitis was strongly associated with rheumatic joint diseases (P < 0.001, sensitivity 61.7%, specificity 96.1%). The correlation between the two observers was high (r = 0.941). Conclusion : The proposed synovitis score is based on well‐defined, reproducible histopathological criteria and may contribute to diagnosis in rheumatic and non‐rheumatic joint diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02508.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 834

Metadata

Authors
Krenn, V, Morawietz, L., Burmester, G., Kinne, R. W., Mueller‐Ladner, U., Muller, B., & Haupl, T.
Venue
Histopathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09-15
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
358-364
ISSN
  • 0309-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2559
OpenAlex
W2167795966
Cited by
834
References
14
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synovitis score: discrimination between chronic low‐grade and high‐grade synovitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02508.x
The paper
Krenn, V, Morawietz, L., Burmester, G., Kinne, R. W., Mueller‐Ladner, U., Muller, B., & Haupl, T. (2006). Synovitis score: discrimination between chronic low‐grade and high‐grade synovitis. Histopathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02508.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.